PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) and Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSHE.TO achieves a -13.46% return, which is significantly lower than HDIF.TO's 11.54% return.


MSHE.TO

1D
-2.54%
1M
6.93%
YTD
-13.46%
6M
-13.17%
1Y
-8.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDIF.TO

1D
-0.73%
1M
6.52%
YTD
11.54%
6M
12.52%
1Y
28.86%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSHE.TO and HDIF.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSHE.TO
MSHE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MSHE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSHE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSHE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MSHE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSHE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

HDIF.TO
HDIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HDIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
HDIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) and Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSHE.TOHDIF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.42

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

3.30

-3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.45

13.66

-14.11

MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSHE.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the HDIF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSHE.TO and HDIF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSHE.TOHDIF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

2.29

-2.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.53

-0.54

Drawdowns

MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, which is greater than HDIF.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSHE.TO and HDIF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSHE.TOHDIF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.62%

-24.07%

-13.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.62%

-8.79%

-28.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.77%

-0.73%

-23.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-6.65%

-4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.36%

2.12%

+16.24%

Volatility

MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) at 3.50%. This indicates that MSHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSHE.TOHDIF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.24%

3.50%

+7.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.57%

10.37%

+14.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.13%

12.67%

+14.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.27%

17.49%

+10.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.27%

17.49%

+10.78%

MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSHE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HDIF.TO's 2.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Dividend Comparison

MSHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.77%, more than HDIF.TO's 10.21% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HDIF.TO
Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units
10.21%9.93%10.15%10.62%8.95%
MSHE.TO
Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units
21.77%17.17%5.28%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSHE.TO and HDIF.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSHE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSHE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 2.47% for HDIF.TO.

Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MSHE.TO and 2.47% for HDIF.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSHE.TO and HDIF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer