MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO
MSHE.TO (Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and HDIF.TO (Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds from Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSHE.TO returned -8.22% vs 28.86% for HDIF.TO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSHE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for HDIF.TO.
Performance
MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSHE.TO achieves a -13.46% return, which is significantly lower than HDIF.TO's 11.54% return.
MSHE.TO
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- -13.46%
- 6M
- -13.17%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDIF.TO
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 6.52%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 28.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSHE.TO Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | -13.46% | 8.80% | 5.80% |
HDIF.TO Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units | 11.54% | 15.61% | 5.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSHE.TO and HDIF.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MSHE.TO
HDIF.TO
MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) and Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSHE.TO | HDIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.42 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 3.30 | -3.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 13.66 | -14.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSHE.TO | HDIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | 2.29 | -2.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.53 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, which is greater than HDIF.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSHE.TO and HDIF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSHE.TO | HDIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.62% | -24.07% | -13.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.62% | -8.79% | -28.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.77% | -0.73% | -23.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -6.65% | -4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.36% | 2.12% | +16.24% |
Volatility
MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) at 3.50%. This indicates that MSHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSHE.TO | HDIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 3.50% | +7.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.57% | 10.37% | +14.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.13% | 12.67% | +14.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 17.49% | +10.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 17.49% | +10.78% |
MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSHE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HDIF.TO's 2.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSHE.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Dividend Comparison
MSHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.77%, more than HDIF.TO's 10.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDIF.TO Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units | 10.21% | 9.93% | 10.15% | 10.62% | 8.95% |
MSHE.TO Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 21.77% | 17.17% | 5.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSHE.TO and HDIF.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSHE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSHE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 2.47% for HDIF.TO.
Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MSHE.TO and 2.47% for HDIF.TO.
Find the right allocation for MSHE.TO and HDIF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer