MSGS vs. TPR
MSGS (Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.) and TPR (Tapestry, Inc.) are both stocks. MSGS operates in Entertainment (Communication Services), while TPR operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, MSGS returned 16.70%/yr vs 16.68%/yr for TPR. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSGS vs. TPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSGS achieves a 47.23% return, which is significantly higher than TPR's 9.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MSGS having a 16.70% annualized return and TPR not far behind at 16.68%.
MSGS
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 11.95%
- YTD
- 47.23%
- 6M
- 70.36%
- 1Y
- 101.13%
- 3Y*
- 28.76%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- 16.70%
TPR
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 25.51%
- 1Y
- 79.96%
- 3Y*
- 52.63%
- 5Y*
- 29.96%
- 10Y*
- 16.68%
MSGS vs. TPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSGS Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. | 47.23% | 14.61% | 24.12% | -0.82% | 10.47% | -5.63% | 23.03% | 9.90% | 26.96% | 22.94% |
TPR Tapestry, Inc. | 9.56% | 98.73% | 82.80% | 0.16% | -3.32% | 32.29% | 16.86% | -15.97% | -22.09% | 30.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSGS and TPR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2015 | 0.31 |
The correlation between MSGS and TPR shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MSGS:
$9.20B
TPR:
$29.08B
MSGS:
-$0.07
TPR:
$3.15
MSGS:
8.52
TPR:
3.74
MSGS:
$1.08B
TPR:
$7.85B
MSGS:
$48.32M
TPR:
$5.98B
MSGS:
-$41.02M
TPR:
$1.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSGS vs. TPR — Risk / Return Rank
MSGS
TPR
MSGS vs. TPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSGS | TPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.36 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.09 | 4.19 | +5.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.05 | 10.79 | +13.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSGS | TPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.45 | 1.97 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.75 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.38 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.44 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
MSGS vs. TPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSGS drawdown since its inception was -41.57%, smaller than the maximum TPR drawdown of -82.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSGS and TPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSGS | TPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.57% | -82.55% | +40.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -19.21% | +9.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.54% | -39.54% | +14.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.96% | -41.87% | +9.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.57% | -79.06% | +37.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -12.78% | +12.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -27.74% | +17.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 7.44% | -3.22% |
Volatility
MSGS vs. TPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) is 7.21%, while Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) has a volatility of 17.04%. This indicates that MSGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSGS | TPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 17.04% | -9.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.35% | 28.29% | -4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.52% | 40.80% | -11.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.35% | 40.25% | -14.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.44% | 44.23% | -12.79% |
Dividends
MSGS vs. TPR - Dividend Comparison
MSGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSGS Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.82% | 0.00% | 36.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPR Tapestry, Inc. | 1.11% | 1.17% | 2.14% | 3.53% | 2.89% | 1.23% | 1.09% | 5.01% | 3.00% | 3.06% | 3.85% | 4.13% |
Financials
MSGS vs. TPR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. and Tapestry, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MSGS vs. TPR - Profitability Comparison
MSGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. reported a gross profit of -121.61M and revenue of 432.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -28.1%.
TPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.48B and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.
MSGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. reported an operating income of 1.96M and revenue of 432.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.
TPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported an operating income of 427.50M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.
MSGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. reported a net income of 555.00K and revenue of 432.20M, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
TPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a net income of 343.80M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSGS and TPR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPR has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to MSGS (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSGS dropped -41.57% vs TPR's -82.55%.
MSGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSGS and TPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer