MSFX vs. XTAP
MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFX returned -48.16% vs 18.69% for XTAP. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSFX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.
Performance
MSFX vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -38.35% return, which is significantly lower than XTAP's 11.99% return.
MSFX
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- 6M
- -30.56%
- YTD
- -38.35%
- 1Y
- -48.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTAP
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 11.66%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- —
MSFX vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | -38.35% | 9.84% | 3.03% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 11.99% | 17.58% | 13.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFX and XTAP is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between MSFX and XTAP shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MSFX vs. XTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSFX
XTAP
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MSFX
XTAP
Basic Materials
MSFX
-
XTAP
Communication Services
MSFX
-
XTAP
Consumer Cyclical
MSFX
-
XTAP
Consumer Defensive
MSFX
-
XTAP
Energy
MSFX
-
XTAP
Financial Services
MSFX
-
XTAP
Healthcare
MSFX
-
XTAP
Industrials
MSFX
-
XTAP
Real Estate
MSFX
-
XTAP
Utilities
MSFX
-
XTAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFX vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank
MSFX
XTAP
MSFX vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFX | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 2.00 | -1.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 10.94 | -11.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 57.97 | -59.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFX vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -63.56%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and XTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFX | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.56% | -22.13% | -41.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.56% | -1.72% | -61.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.33% | -0.25% | -53.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.81% | -3.39% | -19.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.05% | 0.32% | +36.73% |
Volatility
MSFX vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) has a higher volatility of 21.20% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.48%. This indicates that MSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFX | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.20% | 1.48% | +19.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.30% | 3.83% | +45.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.72% | 4.77% | +49.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.30% | 14.55% | +35.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.30% | 14.28% | +36.02% |
MSFX vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFX vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison
MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, while XTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | 8.67% | 5.34% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFX and XTAP have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFX has higher volatility (21.20%) compared to XTAP (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFX dropped -63.56% vs XTAP's -22.13%.
On 1-year performance, XTAP leads with 18.69% vs -48.16% for MSFX. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XTAP has performed better with a 18.69% return vs -48.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSFX.
MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.00% for XTAP.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSFX and 0.79% for XTAP.
XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.93 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFX and XTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer