MSFX vs. TERG
MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MSFX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
MSFX vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -19.85% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 118.24% return.
MSFX
- 1D
- 5.74%
- 1M
- 37.34%
- 6M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- -19.85%
- 1Y
- -36.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.75%
TERG
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -8.01%
- 6M
- 44.99%
- YTD
- 118.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.46M | $6.03M | $5.49M | |
| $2.08M | $2.39M | $4.94M |
MSFX vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | -19.85% | -13.39% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 118.24% | 20.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFX and TERG is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFX vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
MSFX
TERG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSFX vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFX | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFX vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -63.56%, roughly equal to the maximum TERG drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFX | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.56% | -60.59% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.33% | -48.67% | +9.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.33% | -18.83% | -4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.70% | — | — |
Volatility
MSFX vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFX | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.33% | 158.05% | -94.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.73% | 158.05% | -104.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.73% | 158.05% | -104.32% |
MSFX vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFX vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | 6.66% | 5.34% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFX and TERG have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSFX.
MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSFX and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for MSFX and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer