MSFW vs. YBTC
MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) and YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while YBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YBTC.
Performance
MSFW vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MSFW having a -29.51% return and YBTC slightly lower at -29.52%.
MSFW
- 1D
- -3.05%
- 1M
- -15.28%
- YTD
- -29.51%
- 6M
- -30.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBTC
- 1D
- -4.56%
- 1M
- -20.39%
- YTD
- -29.52%
- 6M
- -28.94%
- 1Y
- -40.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFW vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | -29.51% | -7.80% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | -29.52% | -24.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFW and YBTC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFW vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank
MSFW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YBTC
MSFW vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFW | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.82 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFW vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum YBTC drawdown of -48.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and YBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFW | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.42% | -48.82% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -48.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.05% | -48.53% | +9.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -13.63% | -4.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 27.86% | — |
Volatility
MSFW vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFW | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.77% | 40.04% | -7.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.77% | 40.98% | -8.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.77% | 40.98% | -8.21% |
MSFW vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than YBTC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFW vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison
MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.19%, less than YBTC's 93.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | 50.19% | 20.25% | 0.00% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | 93.68% | 76.04% | 44.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFW and YBTC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, YBTC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
YBTC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFW.
YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 93.68%, compared with 50.19% for MSFW.
MSFW is categorized as Derivative Income, while YBTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 0.95% for YBTC.
Find the right allocation for MSFW and YBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer