MSFW vs. LQTI
MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
MSFW vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.16% return.
MSFW
- 1D
- -3.61%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- -14.73%
- 6M
- -13.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFW vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | -14.73% | -7.81% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.16% | 3.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFW and LQTI is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFW vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
MSFW
LQTI
MSFW vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 0.88 | -1.64 |
Drawdowns
MSFW vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.42% | -3.41% | -37.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.27% | -1.44% | -24.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.45% | -0.88% | -16.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
MSFW vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.40% | 5.10% | +27.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.40% | 5.97% | +26.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.40% | 5.97% | +26.43% |
MSFW vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFW vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.31%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.11% | 7.01% |
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | 39.31% | 20.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFW and LQTI have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFW.
MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 39.31%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for MSFW and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer