MSFW vs. CHPY

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) and CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

MSFW vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -21.45% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 63.11% return.

MSFW

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: 1.75%
• 6M: -15.87%
• YTD: -21.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPY

• 1D: -4.40%
• 1M: -9.52%
• 6M: 49.62%
• YTD: 63.11%
• 1Y: 98.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFW vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF	-21.45%	-7.80%
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	63.11%	22.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFW and CHPY is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

MSFW vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CHPY

CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 91
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFW vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFW	CHPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.77	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.08	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.44	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	23.10	—

Drawdowns

MSFW vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -16.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and CHPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFW	CHPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.85%	-16.93%	-24.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.08%	-16.93%	-15.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.41%	-2.48%	-16.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSFW	CHPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	31.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.58%	35.76%	-2.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.58%	37.88%	-4.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.58%	37.88%	-4.30%

MSFW vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSFW and CHPY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

MSFW vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.07%, more than CHPY's 36.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	36.41%	28.19%
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF	48.07%	20.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFW and CHPY in my portfolio?

MSFW and CHPY have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSFW or CHPY?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFW or CHPY?

MSFW and CHPY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFW or CHPY?

MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 48.07%, compared with 36.41% for CHPY.

What is the main difference between MSFW and CHPY?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.