PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFU vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFU vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -51.47% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 17.65% return.


MSFU

1D
-7.02%
1M
-29.71%
YTD
-51.47%
6M
-52.42%
1Y
-56.16%
3Y*
-11.71%
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
6.51%
1M
45.64%
YTD
17.65%
6M
21.49%
1Y
115.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFU vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSFU and WNTR is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFU vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFU
MSFU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFU Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFU vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFUWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.33

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

2.73

-3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.67

6.99

-8.66

MSFU vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFU Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFU and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFU vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -62.43%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFUWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.43%

-42.65%

-19.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.43%

-42.65%

-19.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.43%

-4.02%

-58.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.08%

-20.87%

+3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.63%

16.66%

+16.97%

Volatility

MSFU vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) has a higher volatility of 23.61% compared to YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 18.14%. This indicates that MSFU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFUWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.61%

18.14%

+5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.20%

46.41%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.41%

53.16%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.77%

53.31%

-6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.77%

53.31%

-6.54%

MSFU vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFU vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.25%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MSFU
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares
15.25%8.15%7.00%2.11%0.54%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
94.34%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFU and WNTR have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFU has higher volatility (23.61%) compared to WNTR (18.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFU dropped -62.43% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs -56.16% for MSFU. On fees, WNTR is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 18.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs -56.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WNTR is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for MSFU.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 15.25% for MSFU.

MSFU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for MSFU and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFU and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer