MSFU vs. IFED
MSFU (Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - MSFU tracks the Microsoft Corporation (150%) while IFED tracks the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSFU returned 1.80%/yr vs 17.19%/yr for IFED. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSFU charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
MSFU vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -22.90% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -2.31% return.
MSFU
- 1D
- -8.36%
- 1M
- 12.13%
- YTD
- -22.90%
- 6M
- -25.88%
- 1Y
- -21.45%
- 3Y*
- 1.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFED
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- -2.31%
- 6M
- -1.82%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFU vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares | -22.90% | 13.36% | 5.80% | 83.04% | -13.28% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -2.31% | 15.02% | 23.04% | 20.78% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFU and IFED is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.51 |
The correlation between MSFU and IFED has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFU vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
MSFU
IFED
MSFU vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFU | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | 0.27 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | 0.51 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.06 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 0.33 | -0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 0.84 | -1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFU | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 0.27 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.66 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
MSFU vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFU | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.83% | -22.36% | -37.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.83% | -14.65% | -45.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.83% | -22.36% | -37.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.32% | -4.31% | -36.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.48% | -5.84% | -10.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.83% | 5.74% | +25.09% |
Volatility
MSFU vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) has a higher volatility of 18.49% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.24%. This indicates that MSFU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFU | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.49% | 4.24% | +14.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.94% | 12.80% | +32.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.77% | 16.17% | +33.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.23% | 19.88% | +26.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.23% | 19.88% | +26.35% |
MSFU vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFU vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares | 10.26% | 8.15% | 7.00% | 2.11% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFU and IFED have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFU has higher volatility (18.49%) compared to IFED (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFU dropped -59.83% vs IFED's -22.36%.
On 3-year performance, IFED leads with 17.19% vs 1.80% for MSFU. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IFED has performed better with a 17.19% return vs 1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for MSFU.
MSFU has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.
MSFU tracks Microsoft Corporation (150%), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for MSFU and 0.45% for IFED.
IFED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFU and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer