MSFU vs. IFED
MSFU (Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - MSFU tracks the Microsoft Corporation (200%) while IFED tracks the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSFU returned 3.90%/yr vs 18.74%/yr for IFED. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MSFU charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
MSFU vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -18.87% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's 10.03% return.
MSFU
- 1D
- 5.90%
- 1M
- 37.88%
- 6M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- -18.87%
- 1Y
- -34.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.80%
IFED
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 13.92%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 14.76%
- 3Y*
- 18.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $159.79K | $83.84K | $44.71K | |
| $236.35M | $210.49M | $216.20M |
MSFU vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares | -18.87% | 13.36% | 5.80% | 83.04% | -13.28% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 10.03% | 15.02% | 23.04% | 20.78% | 3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFU and IFED is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFU vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
MSFU
IFED
MSFU vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFU | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.14 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 0.64 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 2.01 | -2.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFU vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -62.43%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFU | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.43% | -22.36% | -40.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.43% | -20.18% | -42.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.43% | -22.36% | -40.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.20% | -7.61% | -29.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.02% | -5.85% | -12.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.69% | 6.43% | +31.26% |
Volatility
MSFU vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) has a higher volatility of 29.64% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 24.07%. This indicates that MSFU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFU | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.64% | 24.07% | +5.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.29% | 27.96% | +23.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.22% | 29.34% | +33.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.57% | 22.56% | +27.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.57% | 22.56% | +27.01% |
MSFU vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFU vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares | 9.13% | 8.15% | 7.00% | 2.11% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFU and IFED have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFU has higher volatility (29.64%) compared to IFED (24.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFU dropped -62.43% vs IFED's -22.36%.
On 3-year performance, IFED leads with 18.74% vs 3.90% for MSFU. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 24.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IFED has performed better with a 18.74% return vs 3.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for MSFU.
MSFU has the higher dividend yield at 9.13%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.
MSFU tracks Microsoft Corporation (200%), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for MSFU and 0.45% for IFED.
IFED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFU and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer