MSFU vs. BWET

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MSFU (Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Microsoft Corporation (200%), while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSFU returned -6.44%/yr vs 125.74%/yr for BWET. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. MSFU charges 0.98%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

MSFU vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -38.01% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 1,090.11% return.

MSFU

• 1D: 2.79%
• 1M: 1.71%
• 6M: -30.22%
• YTD: -38.01%
• 1Y: -46.61%
• 3Y*: -6.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 17.22%
• 6M: 619.17%
• YTD: 1,090.11%
• 1Y: 1,898.00%
• 3Y*: 125.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFU vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares	-38.01%	13.36%	5.80%	30.96%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	1,090.11%	96.22%	-39.21%	14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFU and BWET is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023	-0.06

Return for Risk

MSFU vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFU

MSFU Risk / Return Rank: 3
MSFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MSFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MSFU Omega Ratio Rank: 3
MSFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MSFU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFU vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFU	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.86	17.89	-18.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.15	6.15	-7.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.89	-1.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	46.63	-47.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.29	176.08	-177.37

MSFU vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFU Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 17.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFU and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFU vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -62.43%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFU	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.43%	-56.90%	-5.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.43%	-41.22%	-21.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.43%	-56.81%	-5.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.02%	-10.91%	-41.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.63%	-23.65%	+6.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.09%	10.89%	+25.20%

Volatility

MSFU vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) is 21.06%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 48.58%. This indicates that MSFU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFU	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.06%	48.58%	-27.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.29%	96.67%	-47.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.44%	107.50%	-53.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.07%	74.64%	-27.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.07%	74.64%	-27.57%

MSFU vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFU vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.94%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares	11.94%	8.15%	7.00%	2.11%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFU and BWET in my portfolio?

MSFU and BWET have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFU or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (48.58%) compared to MSFU (21.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFU dropped -62.43% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, MSFU or BWET?

On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 125.74% vs -6.44% for MSFU. On fees, MSFU is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, MSFU has been the lower-risk option at 21.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFU or BWET?

Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 125.74% return vs -6.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFU or BWET?

MSFU is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFU or BWET?

MSFU has the higher dividend yield at 11.94%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between MSFU and BWET?

MSFU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BWET is Commodities. MSFU tracks Microsoft Corporation (200%), while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for MSFU and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.89 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.