MSFU vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MSFU (Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Microsoft Corporation (150%), while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. MSFU is passively managed, while BAMU is actively managed. Over the past year, MSFU returned -26.77% vs 2.95% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. MSFU charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

MSFU vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -27.58% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.08% return.

MSFU

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 7.06%
• YTD: -27.58%
• 6M: -27.68%
• 1Y: -26.77%
• 3Y*: -0.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 2.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFU vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares	-27.58%	13.36%	5.80%	29.75%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.08%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFU and BAMU is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	-0.01

The correlation between MSFU and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MSFU vs. BAMU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSFU	BAMU
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	98.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MSFU vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFU

MSFU Risk / Return Rank: 5
MSFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MSFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
MSFU Omega Ratio Rank: 5
MSFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
MSFU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFU vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSFU	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	5.01	-5.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.48	8.83	-9.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	2.42	-1.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.45	25.06	-25.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	98.57	-99.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSFU vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFU Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFU and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFU	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.54	5.01	-5.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	4.15	-3.95

Drawdowns

MSFU vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFU	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.83%	-0.36%	-59.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.83%	-0.12%	-59.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.94%	0.00%	-43.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.54%	-0.02%	-16.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.08%	0.03%	+31.05%

Volatility

MSFU vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) has a higher volatility of 19.71% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.07%. This indicates that MSFU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFU	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.71%	0.07%	+19.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.31%	0.43%	+44.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.14%	0.59%	+49.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.30%	0.87%	+45.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.30%	0.87%	+45.43%

MSFU vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFU vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.93%, more than BAMU's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%	0.00%
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares	10.93%	8.15%	7.00%	2.11%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFU and BAMU in my portfolio?

MSFU and BAMU have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFU or BAMU?

MSFU has higher volatility (19.71%) compared to BAMU (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFU dropped -59.83% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, MSFU or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.95% vs -26.77% for MSFU. On fees, MSFU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFU or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.95% return vs -26.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFU or BAMU?

MSFU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFU or BAMU?

MSFU has the higher dividend yield at 10.93%, compared with 3.06% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between MSFU and BAMU?

MSFU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for MSFU and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.