MSFT vs. VEA
MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Over the past 10 years, MSFT returned 23.18%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for VEA. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MSFT vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 11.59% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 23.18%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.92% annualized return.
MSFT
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 6.03%
- 6M
- -12.13%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 1Y
- -20.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 23.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.73%
VEA
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 17.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.03%
MSFT vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -16.45% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 11.59% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFT and VEA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MSFT and VEA has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFT vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
MSFT
VEA
MSFT vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFT | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.28 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.23 | -2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 8.35 | -9.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFT vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFT | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -60.68% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.50% | -11.63% | -22.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.50% | -13.45% | -21.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.15% | -29.71% | -7.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.15% | -35.73% | -1.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.32% | -4.37% | -20.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.80% | -13.22% | -8.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.74% | 3.09% | +15.65% |
Volatility
MSFT vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a higher volatility of 10.25% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 5.31%. This indicates that MSFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFT | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.25% | 5.31% | +4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.51% | 15.14% | +9.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.52% | 17.09% | +10.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 16.78% | +10.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.15% | 17.18% | +9.97% |
Dividends
MSFT vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.88% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFT and VEA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to VEA (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs VEA's -60.68%.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFT and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer