MSFT vs. QYLD
MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Over the past 10 years, MSFT returned 23.18%/yr vs 9.59%/yr for QYLD. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MSFT vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.22% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 23.18%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 9.59% annualized return.
MSFT
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 6.03%
- 6M
- -12.13%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 1Y
- -20.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 23.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.73%
QYLD
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- 6M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 1Y
- 19.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.55%
MSFT vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -16.45% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.22% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFT and QYLD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MSFT and QYLD has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFT vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
MSFT
QYLD
MSFT vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFT | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.38 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 4.04 | -4.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 19.75 | -20.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFT vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFT | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -24.75% | -44.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.50% | -4.97% | -29.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.50% | -19.06% | -15.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.15% | -24.61% | -12.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.15% | -24.75% | -12.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.32% | -3.37% | -21.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.80% | -3.81% | -17.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.74% | 1.01% | +17.73% |
Volatility
MSFT vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a higher volatility of 10.25% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 5.86%. This indicates that MSFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFT | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.25% | 5.86% | +4.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.51% | 9.67% | +14.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.52% | 10.83% | +16.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 14.98% | +12.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.15% | 15.60% | +11.55% |
Dividends
MSFT vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than QYLD's 12.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.88% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 12.88% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFT and QYLD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to QYLD (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFT and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer