MSFT vs. NBIS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) and NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) are both stocks. MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past year, MSFT returned -17.75% vs 362.13% for NBIS. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MSFT vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -18.85% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 177.59% return.

MSFT

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -3.36%
• YTD: -18.85%
• 6M: -17.98%
• 1Y: -17.75%
• 3Y*: 6.16%
• 5Y*: 9.56%
• 10Y*: 24.39%

NBIS

• 1D: 4.55%
• 1M: 12.10%
• YTD: 177.59%
• 6M: 164.98%
• 1Y: 362.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	-18.85%	15.58%	1.35%
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.	177.59%	202.18%	46.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT and NBIS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024	0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap MSFT : $2.91T NBIS : $71.79B
EPS MSFT : $16.79 NBIS : $3.17
PE Ratio MSFT : 23.27 NBIS : 73.19
PEG Ratio MSFT : 1.63 NBIS : 25.15
PS Ratio MSFT : 9.16 NBIS : 69.73
PB Ratio MSFT : 7.02 NBIS : 9.91
Total Revenue (TTM) MSFT : $318.27B NBIS : $877.90M
Gross Profit (TTM) MSFT : $217.41B NBIS : $420.60M
EBITDA (TTM) MSFT : $200.96B NBIS : -$52.78M

Return for Risk

MSFT vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT

MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 17
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 14
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 20

NBIS

NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 95
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 91
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFT	NBIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	3.50	-4.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.84	3.75	-4.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.42	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	8.03	-8.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.08	18.34	-19.42

MSFT vs. NBIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the NBIS Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT and NBIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFT vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and NBIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFT	NBIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.38%	-58.27%	-11.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.91%	-45.47%	+11.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.46%	-12.15%	-15.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.78%	-18.94%	-2.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.48%	19.86%	-3.38%

Volatility

MSFT vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is 10.52%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 30.23%. This indicates that MSFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFT	NBIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.52%	30.23%	-19.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.31%	71.43%	-49.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.42%	104.41%	-78.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.66%	110.20%	-83.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.06%	110.20%	-83.14%

Dividends

MSFT vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison

MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while NBIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	0.91%	0.70%	0.73%	0.74%	1.06%	0.68%	0.94%	1.20%	1.69%	1.86%	2.37%	2.33%
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFT and NBIS in my portfolio?

MSFT and NBIS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFT or NBIS?

NBIS has higher volatility (30.23%) compared to MSFT (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs NBIS's -58.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.