PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFT.TO vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSFT.TO vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MSFT.TO is traded in CAD, while META is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the META values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT.TO achieves a -19.71% return, which is significantly lower than META's -12.29% return.


MSFT.TO

1D
0.07%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
-19.71%
6M
-19.03%
1Y
-18.96%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
10Y*

META

1D
-0.07%
1M
-6.53%
YTD
-12.29%
6M
-10.59%
1Y
-14.41%
3Y*
30.10%
5Y*
14.79%
10Y*
18.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT.TO vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MSFT.TO
Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged)
-19.71%12.65%11.26%56.34%-8.31%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-12.29%7.93%80.11%187.14%-24.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT.TO and META is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2022

0.53

The correlation between MSFT.TO and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFT.TO vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT.TO
MSFT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MSFT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT.TO vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFT.TOMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

0.94

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

-0.49

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

-1.02

-0.14

MSFT.TO vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT.TO and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFT.TO vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.43%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT.TO and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFT.TOMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.43%

-74.70%

+40.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.43%

-32.92%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.43%

-33.74%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.66%

-27.02%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-15.46%

+5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.07%

15.88%

+1.19%

Volatility

MSFT.TO vs. META - Volatility Comparison

Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) have volatilities of 10.64% and 10.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFT.TOMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.64%

10.22%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.49%

26.49%

-4.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.46%

35.28%

-9.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.37%

44.33%

-17.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.37%

39.18%

-12.81%

Dividends

MSFT.TO vs. META - Dividend Comparison

MSFT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than META's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.37%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%
MSFT.TO
Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged)
0.92%0.71%0.73%0.75%0.56%

Financials

MSFT.TO vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


25.00B30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00B50.00B55.00B60.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
56.31B
(MSFT.TO) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MSFT.TO values in CAD, META values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFT.TO and META have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFT.TO and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer