PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFT.NEO vs. COKE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSFT.NEO vs. COKE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MSFT.NEO is traded in CAD, while COKE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COKE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT.NEO achieves a -14.38% return, which is significantly lower than COKE's 19.56% return.


MSFT.NEO

1D
-2.65%
1M
0.63%
YTD
-14.38%
6M
-14.51%
1Y
-12.53%
3Y*
6.46%
5Y*
10Y*

COKE

1D
5.88%
1M
-12.63%
YTD
19.56%
6M
8.31%
1Y
73.97%
3Y*
41.56%
5Y*
38.33%
10Y*
32.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT.NEO vs. COKE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MSFT.NEO
Microsoft Corp CDR
-14.38%12.61%11.26%56.34%-29.26%16.37%
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
19.56%17.01%50.67%78.89%-11.18%53.90%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT.NEO and COKE is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021

0.10

The correlation between MSFT.NEO and COKE shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSFT.NEO:

CA$218.09B

COKE:

$11.99B

EPS

MSFT.NEO:

CA$14.11

COKE:

$7.14

PE Ratio

MSFT.NEO:

2.08

COKE:

25.21

PS Ratio

MSFT.NEO:

0.74

COKE:

1.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSFT.NEO:

CA$293.81B

COKE:

$7.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSFT.NEO:

CA$202.04B

COKE:

$2.95B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFT.NEO vs. COKE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT.NEO
MSFT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MSFT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

COKE
COKE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
COKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
COKE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
COKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
COKE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT.NEO vs. COKE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFT.NEOCOKEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.37

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

3.03

-3.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.75

9.18

-9.94

MSFT.NEO vs. COKE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT.NEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the COKE Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT.NEO and COKE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFT.NEOCOKEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

2.13

-2.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.78

-0.51

Drawdowns

MSFT.NEO vs. COKE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -37.95%, smaller than the maximum COKE drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT.NEO and COKE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFT.NEOCOKEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.95%

-50.98%

+13.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.54%

-24.56%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.54%

-30.02%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.95%

-15.64%

-8.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-15.40%

+3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.66%

8.08%

+8.58%

Volatility

MSFT.NEO vs. COKE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) is 10.28%, while Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) has a volatility of 20.06%. This indicates that MSFT.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COKE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFT.NEOCOKEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.28%

20.06%

-9.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.22%

29.78%

-7.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.98%

34.98%

-10.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.19%

36.87%

-9.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.19%

36.79%

-9.60%

Dividends

MSFT.NEO vs. COKE - Dividend Comparison

MSFT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than COKE's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
0.56%0.65%1.59%0.54%0.20%0.16%0.38%0.35%0.56%0.46%0.56%0.55%
MSFT.NEO
Microsoft Corp CDR
0.86%0.70%0.73%0.75%1.07%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MSFT.NEO vs. COKE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microsoft Corp CDR and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
77.67B
1.85B
(MSFT.NEO) Total Revenue
(COKE) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MSFT.NEO values in CAD, COKE values in USD

MSFT.NEO vs. COKE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Microsoft Corp CDR and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
69.1%
39.4%
Portfolio components
MSFT.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported a gross profit of 53.63B and revenue of 77.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.1%.

COKE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. reported a gross profit of 727.08M and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

MSFT.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported an operating income of 37.96B and revenue of 77.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.9%.

COKE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. reported an operating income of 237.52M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

MSFT.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported a net income of 27.75B and revenue of 77.67B, resulting in a net margin of 35.7%.

COKE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. reported a net income of 111.56M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSFT.NEO and COKE have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFT.NEO and COKE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer