PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COKE vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COKE vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COKE achieves a 16.03% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 14.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with COKE having a 31.36% annualized return and AAPL not far behind at 30.12%.


COKE

1D
1.34%
1M
-15.46%
YTD
16.03%
6M
8.20%
1Y
60.28%
3Y*
38.41%
5Y*
34.02%
10Y*
31.36%

AAPL

1D
-1.57%
1M
12.18%
YTD
14.34%
6M
9.39%
1Y
53.24%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
20.38%
10Y*
30.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COKE vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
16.03%22.63%38.75%82.92%-17.09%133.24%-5.87%60.74%-17.10%20.94%
AAPL
Apple Inc
14.34%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between COKE and AAPL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COKE:

$11.81B

AAPL:

$4.58T

EPS

COKE:

$7.14

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

COKE:

24.85

AAPL:

37.67

PEG Ratio

COKE:

0.51

AAPL:

4.96

PS Ratio

COKE:

1.92

AAPL:

10.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

COKE:

$7.49B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COKE:

$2.95B

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

COKE:

$1.10B

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COKE vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COKE
COKE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
COKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
COKE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
COKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
COKE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COKE vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COKEAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.43

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.88

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.61

9.76

-2.15

COKE vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COKE Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COKE and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COKEAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.40

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.75

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

1.05

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.44

+0.01

Drawdowns

COKE vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COKE drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COKE and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COKEAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.32%

-81.80%

+27.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.56%

-13.80%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-33.36%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.52%

-33.36%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.71%

-38.52%

-13.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.14%

-1.57%

-16.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.88%

-29.61%

+10.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.96%

5.47%

+2.49%

Volatility

COKE vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) has a higher volatility of 19.09% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.46%. This indicates that COKE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COKEAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.09%

5.46%

+13.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.77%

15.91%

+12.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.20%

22.32%

+11.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.41%

27.46%

+9.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.11%

28.89%

+8.22%

Dividends

COKE vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

COKE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
0.56%0.65%1.59%0.54%0.20%0.16%0.38%0.35%0.56%0.46%0.56%0.55%

Financials

COKE vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
1.85B
111.18B
(COKE) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COKE vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
39.4%
49.3%
Portfolio components
COKE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. reported a gross profit of 727.08M and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

COKE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. reported an operating income of 237.52M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

COKE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. reported a net income of 111.56M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COKE and AAPL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COKE has higher volatility (19.09%) compared to AAPL (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COKE dropped -54.32% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COKE and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer