MSFO vs. YMAG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MSFO (YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF ) and YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while YMAG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFO returned -18.05% vs 16.69% for YMAG. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSFO charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for YMAG.

Performance

MSFO vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -18.98% return, which is significantly lower than YMAG's -3.07% return.

MSFO

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: -10.24%
• YTD: -18.98%
• 6M: -19.24%
• 1Y: -18.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YMAG

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -7.55%
• YTD: -3.07%
• 6M: -4.07%
• 1Y: 16.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFO vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF	-18.98%	15.69%	4.27%
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs	-3.07%	18.64%	34.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFO and YMAG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.66

The correlation between MSFO and YMAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MSFO vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFO

MSFO Risk / Return Rank: 3
MSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 3
MSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
MSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

YMAG

YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 27
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 27
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFO vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFO	YMAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.81	1.01	-1.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.01	1.42	-2.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.18	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.62	1.17	-1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.28	3.84	-5.12

MSFO vs. YMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFO Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the YMAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFO and YMAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFO vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, which is greater than YMAG's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and YMAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFO	YMAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.29%	-25.96%	-3.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.29%	-14.38%	-14.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.76%	-9.15%	-16.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.84%	-4.56%	-2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.12%	4.35%	+9.77%

Volatility

MSFO vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) has a higher volatility of 9.49% compared to YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) at 5.86%. This indicates that MSFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFO	YMAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.49%	5.86%	+3.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.90%	12.60%	+7.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.40%	16.68%	+5.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.97%	20.98%	-1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.97%	20.98%	-1.01%

MSFO vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFO vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison

MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.39%, less than YMAG's 53.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF	46.39%	33.91%	35.15%	6.44%
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs	53.52%	52.27%	35.22%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFO and YMAG in my portfolio?

MSFO and YMAG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFO or YMAG?

MSFO has higher volatility (9.49%) compared to YMAG (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFO dropped -29.29% vs YMAG's -25.96%.

Which ETF is better, MSFO or YMAG?

On 1-year performance, YMAG leads with 16.69% vs -18.05% for MSFO. On fees, MSFO is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFO or YMAG?

Over the 1-year period, YMAG has performed better with a 16.69% return vs -18.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFO or YMAG?

MSFO is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFO or YMAG?

YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 53.52%, compared with 46.39% for MSFO.

What is the main difference between MSFO and YMAG?

MSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while YMAG is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFO and 1.28% for YMAG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.