MSFO vs. TLTW
MSFO (YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF ) and TLTW (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds. MSFO is actively managed, while TLTW is passively managed. Over the past year, MSFO returned -4.82% vs 10.46% for TLTW. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFO charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for TLTW.
Performance
MSFO vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -9.19% return, which is significantly lower than TLTW's 1.21% return.
MSFO
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- -9.19%
- 6M
- -7.90%
- 1Y
- -4.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTW
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 6M
- -0.20%
- 1Y
- 10.46%
- 3Y*
- 0.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFO vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
| -9.19% | 15.69% | 10.34% | 18.38% |
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF | 1.21% | 11.36% | -2.18% | -2.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFO and TLTW is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFO vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank
MSFO
TLTW
MSFO vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFO | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.24 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 1.76 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | 5.28 | -5.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFO | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | 1.37 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | -0.03 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
MSFO vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, which is greater than TLTW's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and TLTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFO | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.29% | -18.61% | -10.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.29% | -5.97% | -23.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.79% | -3.20% | -13.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -8.25% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.16% | 1.99% | +11.17% |
Volatility
MSFO vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) at 2.48%. This indicates that MSFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFO | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.28% | 2.48% | +5.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.23% | 5.79% | +13.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 7.70% | +13.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 11.39% | +8.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 11.39% | +8.39% |
MSFO vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFO vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison
MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.67%, more than TLTW's 11.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
| 38.67% | 33.91% | 35.15% | 6.44% | 0.00% |
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF | 11.76% | 14.82% | 14.47% | 19.59% | 8.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFO and TLTW have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFO has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to TLTW (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFO dropped -29.29% vs TLTW's -18.61%.
On 1-year performance, TLTW leads with 10.46% vs -4.82% for MSFO. On fees, TLTW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TLTW has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TLTW has performed better with a 10.46% return vs -4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLTW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFO.
MSFO has the higher dividend yield at 38.67%, compared with 11.76% for TLTW.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFO and 0.35% for TLTW.
TLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFO and TLTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer