MSFO vs. DISO
MSFO (YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF ) and DISO (YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while DISO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFO returned -4.82% vs -8.09% for DISO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFO charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for DISO.
Performance
MSFO vs. DISO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -9.19% return, which is significantly higher than DISO's -10.99% return.
MSFO
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- -9.19%
- 6M
- -7.90%
- 1Y
- -4.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DISO
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- -10.99%
- 6M
- -4.80%
- 1Y
- -8.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFO vs. DISO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
| -9.19% | 15.69% | 10.34% | 18.38% |
DISO YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF | -10.99% | 2.12% | 14.56% | 9.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFO and DISO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFO vs. DISO — Risk / Return Rank
MSFO
DISO
MSFO vs. DISO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFO | DISO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.95 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | -0.45 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | -1.02 | +0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFO | DISO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | -0.40 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.22 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
MSFO vs. DISO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, which is greater than DISO's maximum drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and DISO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFO | DISO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.29% | -26.62% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.29% | -18.08% | -11.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.79% | -13.46% | -3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -7.67% | +1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.16% | 7.92% | +5.24% |
Volatility
MSFO vs. DISO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) is 8.28%, while YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that MSFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DISO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFO | DISO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.28% | 9.07% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.23% | 16.10% | +3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 20.24% | +1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 21.53% | -1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 21.53% | -1.75% |
MSFO vs. DISO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than DISO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFO vs. DISO - Dividend Comparison
MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.67%, less than DISO's 44.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DISO YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF | 44.73% | 38.87% | 37.33% | 6.87% |
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
| 38.67% | 33.91% | 35.15% | 6.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFO and DISO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DISO has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to MSFO (8.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFO dropped -29.29% vs DISO's -26.62%.
On 1-year performance, MSFO leads with -4.82% vs -8.09% for DISO. On fees, MSFO is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, MSFO has been the lower-risk option at 8.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSFO has performed better with a -4.82% return vs -8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSFO is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for DISO.
DISO has the higher dividend yield at 44.73%, compared with 38.67% for MSFO.
MSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while DISO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFO and 1.01% for DISO.
MSFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFO and DISO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer