MSFO vs. BWET

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

MSFO (YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. MSFO is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, MSFO returned -7.47% vs 2096.58% for BWET. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MSFO charges 1.03%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

MSFO vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -2.37% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 1,234.62% return.

MSFO

• 1D: -3.81%
• 1M: 17.99%
• 6M: 11.77%
• YTD: -2.37%
• 1Y: -7.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.23%

BWET

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: 51.21%
• 6M: 638.82%
• YTD: 1,234.62%
• 1Y: 2,096.58%
• 3Y*: 134.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 143.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	$42.90M	$39.67M	$30.55M
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF	$1.40M	$1.04M	$1.07M

MSFO vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF	-2.37%	15.69%	10.34%	18.74%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	1,234.62%	96.22%	-39.21%	-11.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFO and BWET is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2023	-0.07

Return for Risk

MSFO vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSFO

MSFO Risk / Return Rank: 7
MSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
MSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
MSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 7
MSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
MSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSFO vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFO	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.27	19.67	-19.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	6.31	-6.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.90	-0.93
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.25	51.53	-51.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.46	193.31	-193.77

MSFO vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFO Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 19.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFO and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFO vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFO	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.65%	-56.90%	+27.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.65%	-41.22%	+11.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.54%	-4.24%	-6.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.46%	-23.34%	+15.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.13%	10.96%	+5.17%

Volatility

MSFO vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) is 15.08%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 31.18%. This indicates that MSFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFO	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.08%	31.18%	-16.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.47%	95.66%	-72.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.86%	108.00%	-80.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.99%	74.38%	-52.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.99%	74.38%	-52.39%

MSFO vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFO has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFO vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.79%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF	35.79%	33.91%	35.15%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFO and BWET in my portfolio?

MSFO and BWET have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFO or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (31.18%) compared to MSFO (15.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFO dropped -29.65% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, MSFO or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 2096.58% vs -7.47% for MSFO. On fees, MSFO is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, MSFO has been the lower-risk option at 15.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFO or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 2096.58% return vs -7.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFO or BWET?

MSFO is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFO or BWET?

MSFO has the higher dividend yield at 35.79%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between MSFO and BWET?

MSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for MSFO and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.67 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.