MSFL vs. NTSD
MSFL (GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
MSFL vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSFL
- 1D
- -6.13%
- 1M
- -24.42%
- YTD
- -47.07%
- 6M
- -47.46%
- 1Y
- -48.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFL vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF | -16.19% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 18.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFL and NTSD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFL vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
MSFL
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSFL vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFL vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFL drawdown since its inception was -59.39%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFL and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.39% | -5.58% | -53.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.76% | -0.88% | -57.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.18% | -1.06% | -21.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.63% | — | — |
Volatility
MSFL vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.97% | 24.87% | +27.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.94% | 24.87% | +25.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.94% | 24.87% | +25.07% |
MSFL vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFL vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSFL nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFL and NTSD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for MSFL.
MSFL and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for MSFL and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for MSFL and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer