MSFD vs. SPDN
MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) and SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion - MSFD tracks the Microsoft Corporation (-100%) while SPDN tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSFD returned -7.16%/yr vs -12.80%/yr for SPDN. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSFD charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPDN.
Performance
MSFD vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFD achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly higher than SPDN's -7.81% return.
MSFD
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- -7.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDN
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- -7.81%
- 6M
- -7.36%
- 1Y
- -16.94%
- 3Y*
- -12.80%
- 5Y*
- -8.88%
- 10Y*
- —
MSFD vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 10.43% | -13.36% | -7.86% | -35.90% | 3.88% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -7.81% | -11.09% | -12.88% | -15.04% | 3.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFD and SPDN is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MSFD and SPDN has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFD vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank
MSFD
SPDN
MSFD vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFD | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.78 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | -0.95 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | -1.74 | +2.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFD | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | -1.41 | +1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.51 | -0.70 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
MSFD vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFD drawdown since its inception was -59.90%, smaller than the maximum SPDN drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFD and SPDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFD | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.90% | -75.31% | +15.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.25% | -17.95% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.50% | -38.24% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.20% | -75.17% | +24.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.59% | -48.54% | +6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.40% | 9.78% | -1.38% |
Volatility
MSFD vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) at 2.78%. This indicates that MSFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFD | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.12% | 2.78% | +7.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.06% | 9.08% | +12.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.32% | 12.10% | +13.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 16.86% | +9.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 18.04% | +8.11% |
MSFD vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFD vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison
MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than SPDN's 4.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 2.83% | 3.33% | 4.46% | 4.43% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 4.09% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFD and SPDN have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFD has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to SPDN (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFD dropped -59.90% vs SPDN's -75.31%.
On 3-year performance, MSFD leads with -7.16% vs -12.80% for SPDN. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MSFD has performed better with a -7.16% return vs -12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MSFD.
SPDN has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 2.83% for MSFD.
MSFD tracks Microsoft Corporation (-100%), while SPDN tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MSFD and 0.50% for SPDN.
MSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFD and SPDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer