MSFD vs. SPDN
MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) and SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion - MSFD tracks the Microsoft Corporation (-100%) while SPDN tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSFD returned -3.82%/yr vs -11.24%/yr for SPDN. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSFD charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPDN.
Performance
MSFD vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFD achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than SPDN's -6.85% return.
MSFD
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 18.10%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 1Y
- 25.82%
- 3Y*
- -3.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDN
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- -12.68%
- 3Y*
- -11.24%
- 5Y*
- -8.03%
- 10Y*
- -12.22%
MSFD vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 19.79% | -13.36% | -7.86% | -35.90% | 3.88% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -6.85% | -11.09% | -12.88% | -15.04% | 1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFD and SPDN is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MSFD and SPDN has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFD vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank
MSFD
SPDN
MSFD vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFD | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.85 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | -0.80 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.58 | -1.53 | +5.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFD vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFD drawdown since its inception was -59.90%, smaller than the maximum SPDN drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFD and SPDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFD | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.90% | -75.31% | +15.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.25% | -15.93% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.50% | -38.24% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.97% | -74.91% | +28.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.64% | -48.79% | +7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.23% | 8.28% | -1.05% |
Volatility
MSFD vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) has a higher volatility of 10.57% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) at 4.18%. This indicates that MSFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFD | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.57% | 4.18% | +6.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.99% | 10.08% | +13.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.34% | 12.73% | +14.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.39% | 16.97% | +9.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.39% | 18.01% | +8.38% |
MSFD vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFD vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison
MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, which matches SPDN's 3.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 3.30% | 3.33% | 4.46% | 4.43% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 3.33% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFD and SPDN have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFD has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to SPDN (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFD dropped -59.90% vs SPDN's -75.31%.
On 3-year performance, MSFD leads with -3.82% vs -11.24% for SPDN. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MSFD has performed better with a -3.82% return vs -11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MSFD.
SPDN has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 3.30% for MSFD.
MSFD tracks Microsoft Corporation (-100%), while SPDN tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MSFD and 0.50% for SPDN.
MSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFD and SPDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer