PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFD vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFD vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFD achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 372.51% return.


MSFD

1D
-2.88%
1M
-18.05%
6M
-11.78%
YTD
-1.78%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
-10.70%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-15.36%

MUU

1D
-12.24%
1M
-36.47%
6M
134.93%
YTD
372.51%
1Y
2,805.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
419.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$21.45M$15.41M$22.03M
$1.51B$1.57B$2.27B

MSFD vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSFD
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares
-1.78%-13.36%-0.61%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
372.51%599.03%-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFD and MUU is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

-0.18

The correlation between MSFD and MUU shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (all time) to -0.05 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFD vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSFD
MSFD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSFD vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFDMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-15.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.61

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

38.27

-37.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.20

127.21

-126.01

MSFD vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFD Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 16.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFD and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFD vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFD drawdown since its inception was -59.90%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFD and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFDMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.90%

-75.07%

+15.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.54%

-68.07%

+41.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.70%

-61.50%

+5.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.72%

-24.34%

-17.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.87%

20.44%

-12.57%

Volatility

MSFD vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) is 18.10%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 62.16%. This indicates that MSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFDMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.10%

62.16%

-44.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.83%

134.20%

-106.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.03%

161.94%

-129.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.55%

146.71%

-119.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.55%

146.71%

-119.16%

MSFD vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFD vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than MUU's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MSFD
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares
4.02%3.33%4.46%4.43%0.74%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
1.44%4.27%0.31%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFD and MUU have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (62.16%) compared to MSFD (18.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFD dropped -59.90% vs MUU's -75.07%.

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 2805.45% vs 7.40% for MSFD. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, MSFD has been the lower-risk option at 18.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 2805.45% return vs 7.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MSFD.

MSFD has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 1.44% for MUU.

MSFD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. MSFD tracks Microsoft Corporation (-100%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MSFD and 1.01% for MUU.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.13 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFD and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer