MSFD vs. CARD
MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds - MSFD tracks the Microsoft Corporation (-100%) while CARD tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSFD returned -10.70%/yr vs -47.16%/yr for CARD. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MSFD charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.
Performance
MSFD vs. CARD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFD achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly higher than CARD's -8.92% return.
MSFD
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- -18.05%
- 6M
- -11.78%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- -10.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -15.36%
CARD
- 1D
- 3.59%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- 6M
- -6.13%
- YTD
- -8.92%
- 1Y
- -38.90%
- 3Y*
- -47.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -52.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $47.33K | $47.63K | $45.90K | |
| $21.45M | $15.41M | $22.03M |
MSFD vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | -1.78% | -13.36% | -7.86% | -9.54% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -8.92% | -60.21% | -58.19% | -32.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFD and CARD is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFD vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank
MSFD
CARD
MSFD vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.96 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | -0.81 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | -1.23 | +2.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFD vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFD drawdown since its inception was -59.90%, smaller than the maximum CARD drawdown of -93.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFD and CARD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.90% | -93.74% | +33.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.54% | -44.14% | +17.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.50% | -93.74% | +53.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.70% | -93.16% | +37.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.72% | -69.56% | +27.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.87% | 29.16% | -21.29% |
Volatility
MSFD vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) is 18.10%, while Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a volatility of 23.32%. This indicates that MSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.10% | 23.32% | -5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.83% | 54.55% | -26.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.03% | 72.06% | -40.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.55% | 80.51% | -52.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.55% | 80.51% | -52.96% |
MSFD vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFD vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison
MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 4.02% | 3.33% | 4.46% | 4.43% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFD and CARD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARD has higher volatility (23.32%) compared to MSFD (18.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFD dropped -59.90% vs CARD's -93.74%.
On 3-year performance, MSFD leads with -10.70% vs -47.16% for CARD. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MSFD has been the lower-risk option at 18.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MSFD has performed better with a -10.70% return vs -47.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MSFD.
MSFD has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
MSFD tracks Microsoft Corporation (-100%), while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MSFD and 0.95% for CARD.
MSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFD and CARD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer