PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFD vs. CARD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFD vs. CARD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFD achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than CARD's -4.58% return.


MSFD

1D
-1.53%
1M
-0.73%
6M
18.10%
YTD
19.79%
1Y
25.82%
3Y*
-3.82%
5Y*
10Y*

CARD

1D
3.15%
1M
-2.03%
6M
9.69%
YTD
-4.58%
1Y
-31.37%
3Y*
-46.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFD vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MSFD
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares
19.79%-13.36%-7.86%-9.54%
CARD
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
-4.58%-60.21%-58.19%-32.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFD and CARD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFD vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFD
MSFD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CARD
CARD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFD vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFDCARDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.97

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

-0.75

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.58

-1.13

+4.71

MSFD vs. CARD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFD Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the CARD Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFD and CARD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFD vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFD drawdown since its inception was -59.90%, smaller than the maximum CARD drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFD and CARD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFDCARDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.90%

-93.51%

+33.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.25%

-42.02%

+18.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.50%

-93.51%

+53.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.97%

-92.83%

+46.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.64%

-69.12%

+27.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.23%

27.71%

-20.48%

Volatility

MSFD vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) is 10.57%, while Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a volatility of 22.93%. This indicates that MSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFDCARDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.57%

22.93%

-12.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.99%

53.32%

-29.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.34%

70.71%

-43.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.39%

80.43%

-54.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.39%

80.43%

-54.04%

MSFD vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFD vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison

MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CARD
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFD
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares
3.30%3.33%4.46%4.43%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFD and CARD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARD has higher volatility (22.93%) compared to MSFD (10.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFD dropped -59.90% vs CARD's -93.51%.

On 3-year performance, MSFD leads with -3.82% vs -46.63% for CARD. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MSFD has been the lower-risk option at 10.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MSFD has performed better with a -3.82% return vs -46.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MSFD.

MSFD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.

MSFD tracks Microsoft Corporation (-100%), while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MSFD and 0.95% for CARD.

MSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFD and CARD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer