MSEQX vs. ACIHX
MSEQX (Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I) and ACIHX (American Century Growth Fund G Class) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, MSEQX returned 25.18%/yr vs 19.66%/yr for ACIHX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSEQX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for ACIHX.
Performance
MSEQX vs. ACIHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSEQX achieves a -7.95% return, which is significantly lower than ACIHX's 1.63% return.
MSEQX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- -7.95%
- 6M
- -11.66%
- 1Y
- -1.47%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- -2.09%
- 10Y*
- 16.86%
ACIHX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 16.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSEQX vs. ACIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSEQX Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I | -7.95% | 24.78% | 46.65% | 50.36% | -19.69% |
ACIHX American Century Growth Fund G Class | 1.63% | 16.26% | 27.35% | 44.64% | -6.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSEQX and ACIHX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2022 | 0.77 |
The correlation between MSEQX and ACIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSEQX vs. ACIHX — Risk / Return Rank
MSEQX
ACIHX
MSEQX vs. ACIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSEQX | ACIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.18 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 1.01 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 3.30 | -3.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSEQX vs. ACIHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSEQX drawdown since its inception was -69.48%, which is greater than ACIHX's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEQX and ACIHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSEQX | ACIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.48% | -24.00% | -45.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.73% | -16.40% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.52% | -24.00% | -8.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.54% | -7.19% | -12.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.90% | -4.89% | -12.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.48% | 5.03% | +8.45% |
Volatility
MSEQX vs. ACIHX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) has a higher volatility of 10.32% compared to American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX) at 6.58%. This indicates that MSEQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSEQX | ACIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.32% | 6.58% | +3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.30% | 13.00% | +9.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.18% | 16.64% | +12.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.85% | 21.11% | +18.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.85% | 21.11% | +12.74% |
MSEQX vs. ACIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSEQX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than ACIHX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSEQX vs. ACIHX - Dividend Comparison
MSEQX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIHX American Century Growth Fund G Class | 15.69% | 15.95% | 5.65% | 4.61% | 2.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSEQX Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 16.79% | 24.24% | 9.36% | 21.39% | 5.38% | 21.18% | 12.71% | 7.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSEQX and ACIHX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSEQX has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to ACIHX (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSEQX dropped -69.48% vs ACIHX's -24.00%.
ACIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSEQX and ACIHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer