PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MSEQX vs. FBGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MSEQX vs. FBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
50.94%
9.21%
MSEQX
FBGX

Returns By Period


MSEQX

YTD

45.91%

1M

22.59%

6M

46.45%

1Y

71.49%

5Y (annualized)

2.03%

10Y (annualized)

3.11%

FBGX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


MSEQXFBGX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MSEQX vs. FBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSEQX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGX's 1.29% expense ratio.


FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
Expense ratio chart for FBGX: current value at 1.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.29%
Expense ratio chart for MSEQX: current value at 0.56% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.56%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between MSEQX and FBGX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSEQX vs. FBGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 2.62, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.002.622.26
The chart of Sortino ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 3.35, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.353.31
The chart of Omega ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.421.55
The chart of Calmar ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.000.981.67
The chart of Martin ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 12.39, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.3916.49
MSEQX
FBGX

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.62
2.26
MSEQX
FBGX

Dividends

MSEQX vs. FBGX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSEQX nor FBGX has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
0.00%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.35%
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MSEQX vs. FBGX - Drawdown Comparison


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-51.06%
-1.14%
MSEQX
FBGX

Volatility

MSEQX vs. FBGX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MSEQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.84%
0
MSEQX
FBGX