PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MSEQX vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


MSEQXSCHG
YTD Return4.66%18.77%
1Y Return18.75%28.24%
3Y Return (Ann)-19.09%8.20%
5Y Return (Ann)6.24%18.91%
10Y Return (Ann)10.80%15.65%
Sharpe Ratio0.721.66
Daily Std Dev27.59%17.14%
Max Drawdown-69.48%-34.59%
Current Drawdown-50.01%-6.97%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between MSEQX and SCHG is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

MSEQX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MSEQX achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 18.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MSEQX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 10.80%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.40%
8.51%
MSEQX
SCHG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

MSEQX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSEQX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
Expense ratio chart for MSEQX: current value at 0.56% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.56%
Expense ratio chart for SCHG: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSEQX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSEQX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.000.72
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.504.001.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.002.77
SCHG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.001.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.504.001.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.89
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 8.38, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.008.38

MSEQX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSEQX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MSEQX and SCHG.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.72
1.66
MSEQX
SCHG

Dividends

MSEQX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

MSEQX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
0.00%0.05%16.79%24.24%9.36%10.70%7.94%21.18%12.71%7.55%4.95%4.46%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.42%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.27%1.22%1.09%1.07%

Drawdowns

MSEQX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSEQX drawdown since its inception was -69.48%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEQX and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-50.01%
-6.97%
MSEQX
SCHG

Volatility

MSEQX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) has a higher volatility of 8.71% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.09%. This indicates that MSEQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
8.71%
6.09%
MSEQX
SCHG