PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSEA.L vs. UC99.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSEA.L achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than UC99.L's 9.99% return.


MSEA.L

1D
0.46%
1M
1.04%
YTD
7.55%
6M
8.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UC99.L

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.93%
YTD
9.99%
6M
9.58%
1Y
29.25%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
14.67%
10Y*
17.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSEA.L and UC99.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSEA.L vs. UC99.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSEA.L

UC99.L
UC99.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UC99.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC99.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC99.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
UC99.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC99.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSEA.LUC99.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.99

1.05

+0.94

Drawdowns

MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSEA.L drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, smaller than the maximum UC99.L drawdown of -23.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEA.L and UC99.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSEA.LUC99.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.45%

-23.04%

+12.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-0.58%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.48%

-4.05%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

Volatility

MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSEA.LUC99.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

12.21%

+2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

16.04%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.18%

16.49%

-1.31%

MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSEA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than UC99.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Dividend Comparison

MSEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC99.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MSEA.L
UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC99.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.41%0.46%0.67%0.85%0.79%0.78%0.98%0.78%1.27%0.93%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSEA.L and UC99.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSEA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSEA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.

MSEA.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while UC99.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. MSEA.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while UC99.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for MSEA.L and 0.25% for UC99.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSEA.L and UC99.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer