MSEA.L vs. UC99.L
MSEA.L (UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A) and UC99.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - MSEA.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Index, while UC99.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSEA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for UC99.L.
Performance
MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSEA.L achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than UC99.L's 9.99% return.
MSEA.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UC99.L
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 9.99%
- 6M
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.30%
- 5Y*
- 14.67%
- 10Y*
- 17.20%
MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSEA.L UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A | 7.55% | 7.48% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 9.99% | 9.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSEA.L and UC99.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSEA.L vs. UC99.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSEA.L
UC99.L
MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSEA.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.99 | 1.05 | +0.94 |
Drawdowns
MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSEA.L drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, smaller than the maximum UC99.L drawdown of -23.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEA.L and UC99.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSEA.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -23.04% | +12.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -0.58% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -4.05% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.58% | — |
Volatility
MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSEA.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 12.21% | +2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 16.04% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 16.49% | -1.31% |
MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSEA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than UC99.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MSEA.L vs. UC99.L - Dividend Comparison
MSEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC99.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSEA.L UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.85% | 0.79% | 0.78% | 0.98% | 0.78% | 1.27% | 0.93% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSEA.L and UC99.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSEA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSEA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.
MSEA.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while UC99.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. MSEA.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while UC99.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for MSEA.L and 0.25% for UC99.L.
Find the right allocation for MSEA.L and UC99.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer