MSEA.L vs. S5SD.L
MSEA.L (UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A) and S5SD.L (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - MSEA.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Index, while S5SD.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSEA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for S5SD.L.
Performance
MSEA.L vs. S5SD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSEA.L achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than S5SD.L's 9.39% return.
MSEA.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
S5SD.L
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 31.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.52%
- 10Y*
- —
MSEA.L vs. S5SD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSEA.L UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A | 7.55% | 7.48% |
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis | 9.39% | 8.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSEA.L and S5SD.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSEA.L vs. S5SD.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSEA.L
S5SD.L
MSEA.L vs. S5SD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSEA.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.99 | 0.68 | +1.30 |
Drawdowns
MSEA.L vs. S5SD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSEA.L drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, smaller than the maximum S5SD.L drawdown of -29.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEA.L and S5SD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSEA.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -29.66% | +19.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -0.71% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -5.69% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.79% | — |
Volatility
MSEA.L vs. S5SD.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSEA.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 10.52% | +4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 14.40% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 18.19% | -3.01% |
MSEA.L vs. S5SD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSEA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than S5SD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MSEA.L vs. S5SD.L - Dividend Comparison
MSEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while S5SD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSEA.L UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis | 0.75% | 0.91% | 0.91% | 1.16% | 1.22% | 0.93% | 1.40% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSEA.L and S5SD.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSEA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSEA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for S5SD.L.
MSEA.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while S5SD.L is S&P 500. MSEA.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while S5SD.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for MSEA.L and 0.12% for S5SD.L.
Find the right allocation for MSEA.L and S5SD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer