MSEA.L vs. PRIE.L
MSEA.L (UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A) and PRIE.L (Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Europe Equities funds - MSEA.L tracks the MSCI Europe Index while PRIE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSEA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRIE.L.
Performance
MSEA.L vs. PRIE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSEA.L achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly higher than PRIE.L's 6.91% return.
MSEA.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRIE.L
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 6M
- 6.34%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- 10.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.25%
- 10Y*
- —
MSEA.L vs. PRIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSEA.L UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A | 7.55% | 7.48% |
PRIE.L Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF DR (D) | 6.91% | 5.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSEA.L and PRIE.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSEA.L vs. PRIE.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSEA.L
PRIE.L
MSEA.L vs. PRIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSEA.L | PRIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.99 | 0.49 | +1.50 |
Drawdowns
MSEA.L vs. PRIE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSEA.L drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, smaller than the maximum PRIE.L drawdown of -28.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEA.L and PRIE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSEA.L | PRIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -28.92% | +18.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -1.14% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -4.71% | +2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.04% | — |
Volatility
MSEA.L vs. PRIE.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSEA.L | PRIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 12.44% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 14.21% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 15.99% | -0.81% |
MSEA.L vs. PRIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSEA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIE.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MSEA.L vs. PRIE.L - Dividend Comparison
MSEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRIE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSEA.L UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRIE.L Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF DR (D) | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSEA.L and PRIE.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRIE.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRIE.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for MSEA.L.
MSEA.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while PRIE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for MSEA.L and 0.05% for PRIE.L.
Find the right allocation for MSEA.L and PRIE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer