FLXD.L vs. XSTC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L).
FLXD.L and XSTC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLXD.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 6, 2017. XSTC.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. Both FLXD.L and XSTC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLXD.L or XSTC.L.
Key characteristics
| FLXD.L | XSTC.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.92% | 32.52% |
| 1Y Return | 10.31% | 38.38% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.59% | 16.20% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.78% | 24.39% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.41 | 1.90 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.80 | 2.53 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.20 | 1.32 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.55 | 2.66 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.84 | 7.98 |
| Ulcer Index | 11.78% | 4.78% |
| Daily Std Dev | 24.04% | 20.07% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.03% | -25.32% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.45% | -0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXD.L and XSTC.L is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FLXD.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FLXD.L achieves a 3.92% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 32.52% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLXD.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLXD.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLXD.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than XSTC.L's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF | 0.81% | 5.73% | 5.89% | 5.49% | 3.90% | 1.53% | 1.09% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.39% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLXD.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXD.L drawdown since its inception was -32.03%, which is greater than XSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -25.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXD.L and XSTC.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLXD.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) is 3.63%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that FLXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.