MSEA.L vs. EUFM.L
MSEA.L (UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A) and EUFM.L (UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc) are both Europe Equities funds from UBS - MSEA.L tracks the MSCI Europe Index while EUFM.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. MSEA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for EUFM.L.
Performance
MSEA.L vs. EUFM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSEA.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUFM.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSEA.L vs. EUFM.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSEA.L
EUFM.L
MSEA.L vs. EUFM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSEA.L | EUFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.39 | — |
Drawdowns
MSEA.L vs. EUFM.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSEA.L | EUFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -34.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.07% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -8.12% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.95% | — |
Volatility
MSEA.L vs. EUFM.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSEA.L | EUFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 12.33% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 18.07% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 18.46% | — |
MSEA.L vs. EUFM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSEA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EUFM.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSEA.L vs. EUFM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSEA.L nor EUFM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MSEA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSEA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for EUFM.L.
MSEA.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while EUFM.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for MSEA.L and 0.34% for EUFM.L.
Find the right allocation for MSEA.L and EUFM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer