MSCFX vs. SSLCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX).
MSCFX is managed by Mairs & Power. It was launched on Aug 11, 2011. SSLCX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 14, 2000.
Performance
MSCFX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MSCFX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSCFX Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund | 3.75% | 3.96% | 7.25% | 11.04% | -14.06% | 30.31% | 8.82% | 21.12% | -6.89% | 7.64% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 0.38% | 4.99% | 9.85% | 13.09% | -13.53% | 41.16% | 14.65% | 21.72% | -14.28% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSCFX achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly higher than SSLCX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MSCFX has underperformed SSLCX with an annualized return of 8.67%, while SSLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.91% annualized return.
MSCFX
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -7.87%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
SSLCX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -4.19%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- -2.10%
- 1Y
- 7.81%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MSCFX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSCFX and SSLCX have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
MSCFX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank
MSCFX
SSLCX
MSCFX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSCFX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.50 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 0.81 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.11 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 0.62 | +0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | 2.03 | +2.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSCFX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.50 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.32 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.47 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.37 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between MSCFX and SSLCX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MSCFX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison
MSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than SSLCX's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSCFX Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund | 2.19% | 2.27% | 2.17% | 0.67% | 6.48% | 11.25% | 2.04% | 3.11% | 4.78% | 3.43% | 1.90% | 1.16% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 0.35% | 0.16% | 5.99% | 5.78% | 0.60% | 8.42% |
Drawdowns
MSCFX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSCFX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, smaller than the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCFX and SSLCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSCFX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.89% | -63.14% | +22.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.42% | -10.06% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.65% | -22.57% | -7.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.89% | -48.07% | +7.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.24% | -5.55% | -4.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -11.38% | +5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 3.09% | +1.43% |
Volatility
MSCFX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison
Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) at 4.67%. This indicates that MSCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MSCFX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 4.67% | +3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.09% | 11.01% | +4.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.58% | 17.54% | +8.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 17.64% | +4.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 21.06% | +1.85% |