PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSCFX vs. RIVSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSCFX vs. RIVSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and River Oak Discovery Fund (RIVSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSCFX achieves a 21.28% return, which is significantly lower than RIVSX's 34.51% return. Over the past 10 years, MSCFX has underperformed RIVSX with an annualized return of 10.06%, while RIVSX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.95% annualized return.


MSCFX

1D
0.37%
1M
5.53%
YTD
21.28%
6M
18.87%
1Y
40.54%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
10.06%

RIVSX

1D
-0.08%
1M
4.12%
YTD
34.51%
6M
32.25%
1Y
54.79%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSCFX vs. RIVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSCFX
Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund
21.28%3.96%7.25%11.04%-14.06%30.31%8.82%21.12%-6.89%7.64%
RIVSX
River Oak Discovery Fund
34.51%9.11%4.42%8.18%-14.53%24.78%29.00%30.36%-13.72%11.33%

Correlation

The correlation between MSCFX and RIVSX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2011

0.87

The correlation between MSCFX and RIVSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSCFX vs. RIVSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSCFX
MSCFX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MSCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
MSCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

RIVSX
RIVSX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
RIVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RIVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSCFX vs. RIVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and River Oak Discovery Fund (RIVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSCFXRIVSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.51

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

6.27

-2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.24

22.06

-10.82

MSCFX vs. RIVSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSCFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the RIVSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSCFX and RIVSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSCFX vs. RIVSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSCFX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, smaller than the maximum RIVSX drawdown of -60.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCFX and RIVSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSCFXRIVSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.89%

-60.61%

+19.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-9.11%

-4.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.65%

-24.52%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.65%

-25.75%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.89%

-41.45%

+0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.08%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-10.46%

+4.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

2.58%

+1.25%

Volatility

MSCFX vs. RIVSX - Volatility Comparison

Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and River Oak Discovery Fund (RIVSX) have volatilities of 6.23% and 6.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSCFXRIVSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

6.42%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

13.06%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.38%

19.00%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.37%

20.35%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.07%

21.95%

+1.12%

MSCFX vs. RIVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSCFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than RIVSX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSCFX vs. RIVSX - Dividend Comparison

MSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than RIVSX's 0.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSCFX
Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund
1.87%2.27%2.17%0.67%6.48%11.25%2.04%3.11%4.78%3.43%1.90%1.16%
RIVSX
River Oak Discovery Fund
0.21%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.15%16.84%14.54%3.81%17.54%5.48%0.00%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSCFX and RIVSX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIVSX has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to MSCFX (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSCFX dropped -40.89% vs RIVSX's -60.61%.

RIVSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSCFX and RIVSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer