MSCFX vs. PRSVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX).
MSCFX is managed by Mairs & Power. It was launched on Aug 11, 2011. PRSVX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1988.
Performance
MSCFX vs. PRSVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MSCFX vs. PRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSCFX Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund | 0.35% | 3.96% | 7.25% | 11.04% | -14.06% | 30.31% | 8.82% | 21.12% | -6.89% | 7.64% |
PRSVX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund | 0.96% | 21.18% | 10.84% | 12.34% | -18.53% | 25.47% | 12.49% | 25.82% | -11.58% | 12.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSCFX achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than PRSVX's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, MSCFX has underperformed PRSVX with an annualized return of 8.31%, while PRSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.62% annualized return.
MSCFX
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -10.09%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 17.27%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
PRSVX
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -6.74%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 15.53%
- 1Y
- 29.66%
- 3Y*
- 15.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MSCFX vs. PRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSCFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PRSVX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MSCFX vs. PRSVX — Risk / Return Rank
MSCFX
PRSVX
MSCFX vs. PRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSCFX | PRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 1.29 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 2.06 | -0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.28 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.82 | -0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | 7.58 | -4.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSCFX | PRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.29 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.33 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.50 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.63 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between MSCFX and PRSVX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MSCFX vs. PRSVX - Dividend Comparison
MSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than PRSVX's 22.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSCFX Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund | 2.26% | 2.27% | 2.17% | 0.67% | 6.48% | 11.25% | 2.04% | 3.11% | 4.78% | 3.43% | 1.90% | 1.16% |
PRSVX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund | 22.57% | 22.79% | 9.77% | 3.27% | 5.28% | 6.98% | 2.03% | 4.59% | 9.46% | 3.79% | 3.77% | 22.55% |
Drawdowns
MSCFX vs. PRSVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSCFX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, smaller than the maximum PRSVX drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCFX and PRSVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSCFX | PRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.89% | -55.37% | +14.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.42% | -14.04% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.65% | -28.17% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.89% | -40.97% | +0.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.19% | -8.16% | -5.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -7.52% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 3.66% | +0.81% |
Volatility
MSCFX vs. PRSVX - Volatility Comparison
Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX) at 6.09%. This indicates that MSCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MSCFX | PRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 6.09% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 15.95% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.42% | 23.77% | +1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.12% | 20.38% | +1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 21.26% | +1.63% |