MSCFX vs. FTMSX
MSCFX (Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund) and FTMSX (Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MSCFX returned 7.16%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FTMSX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSCFX charges 0.95%/yr vs 2.30%/yr for FTMSX.
Performance
MSCFX vs. FTMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSCFX achieves a 20.83% return, which is significantly lower than FTMSX's 31.22% return.
MSCFX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 20.83%
- 1Y
- 31.95%
- 3Y*
- 12.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
FTMSX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 23.17%
- YTD
- 31.22%
- 1Y
- 40.39%
- 3Y*
- 11.99%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- —
MSCFX vs. FTMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSCFX Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund | 20.83% | 3.96% | 7.25% | 11.04% | -14.06% | 30.31% | 8.82% | 21.02% |
FTMSX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund | 31.22% | 0.30% | 3.88% | 13.11% | -31.07% | 37.45% | 15.58% | 17.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSCFX and FTMSX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between MSCFX and FTMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSCFX vs. FTMSX — Risk / Return Rank
MSCFX
FTMSX
MSCFX vs. FTMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSCFX | FTMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.13 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.76 | 7.88 | -0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSCFX vs. FTMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSCFX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, smaller than the maximum FTMSX drawdown of -53.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCFX and FTMSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSCFX | FTMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.89% | -53.12% | +12.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.19% | -17.52% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.65% | -35.01% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.65% | -48.67% | +19.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.56% | -2.55% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -22.08% | +15.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 4.74% | -0.87% |
Volatility
MSCFX vs. FTMSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund (MSCFX) is 6.96%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that MSCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSCFX | FTMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 7.53% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.75% | 17.98% | -2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.53% | 25.86% | -4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 28.14% | -5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.03% | 30.47% | -7.44% |
MSCFX vs. FTMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSCFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FTMSX's 2.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSCFX vs. FTMSX - Dividend Comparison
MSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while FTMSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTMSX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.27% | 0.37% | 4.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSCFX Mairs & Power Small Cap Fund | 1.88% | 2.27% | 2.17% | 0.67% | 6.48% | 11.25% | 2.04% | 3.11% | 4.78% | 3.43% | 1.90% | 1.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSCFX and FTMSX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTMSX has higher volatility (7.53%) compared to MSCFX (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSCFX dropped -40.89% vs FTMSX's -53.12%.
FTMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSCFX and FTMSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer