PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSBHF vs. BX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSBHF vs. BX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mitsubishi Corp (MSBHF) and The Blackstone Group Inc. (BX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSBHF achieves a 43.17% return, which is significantly higher than BX's -26.95% return. Over the past 10 years, MSBHF has outperformed BX with an annualized return of 23.29%, while BX has yielded a comparatively lower 20.78% annualized return.


MSBHF

1D
4.98%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
43.17%
6M
37.76%
1Y
64.15%
3Y*
35.22%
5Y*
32.24%
10Y*
23.29%

BX

1D
-4.03%
1M
-10.41%
YTD
-26.95%
6M
-25.69%
1Y
-17.79%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
20.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSBHF vs. BX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSBHF
Mitsubishi Corp
43.17%45.58%4.78%55.88%4.23%31.37%5.16%-5.35%12.97%19.70%
BX
The Blackstone Group Inc.
-26.95%-7.84%35.07%82.75%-40.01%107.11%19.78%96.33%0.10%27.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MSBHF and BX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2007

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSBHF:

$120.39B

BX:

$86.42B

EPS

MSBHF:

$210.62

BX:

$3.90

PE Ratio

MSBHF:

0.15

BX:

28.25

PEG Ratio

MSBHF:

0.11

BX:

10.39

PS Ratio

MSBHF:

0.01

BX:

5.76

PB Ratio

MSBHF:

0.01

BX:

10.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSBHF:

$19.02T

BX:

$14.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSBHF:

$1.66T

BX:

$13.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

MSBHF:

$1.04T

BX:

$7.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSBHF vs. BX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSBHF
MSBHF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MSBHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSBHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSBHF Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MSBHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSBHF Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

BX
BX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSBHF vs. BX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsubishi Corp (MSBHF) and The Blackstone Group Inc. (BX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSBHFBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

-0.53

+2.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.62

-0.57

+3.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.93

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

-0.40

+3.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.16

-0.76

+13.92

MSBHF vs. BX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSBHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the BX Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSBHF and BX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSBHFBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

-0.53

+2.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.18

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.58

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.27

+0.03

Drawdowns

MSBHF vs. BX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSBHF drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, smaller than the maximum BX drawdown of -87.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSBHF and BX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSBHFBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.05%

-87.62%

+21.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.05%

-44.76%

+26.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.60%

-46.50%

+13.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

-49.29%

+16.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.81%

-49.29%

+11.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.44%

-41.69%

+29.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.37%

-25.70%

+1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

23.49%

-18.60%

Volatility

MSBHF vs. BX - Volatility Comparison

Mitsubishi Corp (MSBHF) has a higher volatility of 14.99% compared to The Blackstone Group Inc. (BX) at 8.58%. This indicates that MSBHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSBHFBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.99%

8.58%

+6.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.46%

27.10%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.27%

33.63%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.09%

39.18%

-8.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.50%

35.67%

-7.17%

Dividends

MSBHF vs. BX - Dividend Comparison

MSBHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than BX's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BX
The Blackstone Group Inc.
4.51%3.04%2.00%2.54%6.66%2.76%2.95%3.43%8.12%7.25%6.14%11.76%
MSBHF
Mitsubishi Corp
2.19%3.05%3.54%3.03%3.46%3.84%5.07%4.56%3.64%1.42%1.39%0.00%

Financials

MSBHF vs. BX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsubishi Corp and The Blackstone Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T5.00T6.00T20222023202420252026
5.27T
4.10B
(MSBHF) Total Revenue
(BX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MSBHF vs. BX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mitsubishi Corp and The Blackstone Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
8.7%
98.5%
Portfolio components
MSBHF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi Corp reported a gross profit of 457.61B and revenue of 5.27T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.7%.

BX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Blackstone Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.04B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.5%.

MSBHF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi Corp reported an operating income of 108.14B and revenue of 5.27T, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.

BX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Blackstone Group Inc. reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.8%.

MSBHF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi Corp reported a net income of 193.75B and revenue of 5.27T, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

BX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Blackstone Group Inc. reported a net income of 649.73M and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSBHF and BX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSBHF has higher volatility (14.99%) compared to BX (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSBHF dropped -66.05% vs BX's -87.62%.

MSBHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSBHF and BX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer