MS vs. NTES
MS (Morgan Stanley) and NTES (NetEase, Inc.) are both stocks. MS operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while NTES operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, MS returned 27.71%/yr vs 16.45%/yr for NTES. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MS vs. NTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MS achieves a 21.88% return, which is significantly higher than NTES's -7.12% return. Over the past 10 years, MS has outperformed NTES with an annualized return of 27.71%, while NTES has yielded a comparatively lower 16.45% annualized return.
MS
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 10.03%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 6M
- 21.28%
- 1Y
- 69.28%
- 3Y*
- 38.69%
- 5Y*
- 22.26%
- 10Y*
- 27.71%
NTES
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- -7.12%
- 6M
- -8.13%
- 1Y
- -0.38%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 16.45%
MS vs. NTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MS Morgan Stanley | 21.88% | 45.16% | 39.73% | 13.93% | -10.34% | 46.65% | 38.09% | 32.67% | -22.76% | 26.61% |
NTES NetEase, Inc. | -7.12% | 58.28% | -1.73% | 30.59% | -27.35% | 7.11% | 57.88% | 34.66% | -31.31% | 62.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between MS and NTES is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
MS:
$340.97B
NTES:
$81.21B
MS:
$11.41
NTES:
CN¥52.95
MS:
18.75
NTES:
16.10
MS:
1.76
NTES:
0.76
MS:
2.84
NTES:
4.80
MS:
3.26
NTES:
3.34
MS:
$120.22B
NTES:
CN¥114.39B
MS:
$69.72B
NTES:
CN¥75.14B
MS:
$27.21B
NTES:
CN¥40.24B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MS vs. NTES — Risk / Return Rank
MS
NTES
MS vs. NTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley (MS) and NetEase, Inc. (NTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MS | NTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.01 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | -0.10 | +3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.65 | -0.17 | +11.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MS vs. NTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MS drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, smaller than the maximum NTES drawdown of -96.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MS and NTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MS | NTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.12% | -96.54% | +8.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.83% | -30.46% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.24% | -33.97% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.38% | -51.38% | +19.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.33% | -57.34% | +6.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -19.45% | +17.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.69% | -24.66% | -9.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.70% | 17.18% | -11.48% |
Volatility
MS vs. NTES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Morgan Stanley (MS) is 8.62%, while NetEase, Inc. (NTES) has a volatility of 9.60%. This indicates that MS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MS | NTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.62% | 9.60% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.46% | 20.92% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.81% | 29.31% | -3.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 43.67% | -14.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.51% | 41.81% | -10.30% |
Dividends
MS vs. NTES - Dividend Comparison
MS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than NTES's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MS Morgan Stanley | 1.87% | 2.17% | 2.82% | 3.49% | 3.47% | 2.14% | 2.04% | 2.54% | 2.77% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.73% |
NTES NetEase, Inc. | 2.40% | 2.21% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 2.10% | 0.80% | 0.97% | 3.19% | 0.71% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.98% |
Financials
MS vs. NTES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Morgan Stanley and NetEase, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MS vs. NTES - Profitability Comparison
MS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a gross profit of 20.48B and revenue of 33.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.
NTES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.22B and revenue of 30.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.
MS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported an operating income of 7.01B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.
NTES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.66B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.4%.
MS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a net income of 5.64B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.
NTES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a net income of 10.67B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in a net margin of 34.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MS and NTES have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTES has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to MS (8.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MS dropped -88.12% vs NTES's -96.54%.
MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MS and NTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer