PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MS vs. AMP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MS vs. AMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley (MS) and Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (AMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MS achieves a 21.88% return, which is significantly higher than AMP's -5.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MS has outperformed AMP with an annualized return of 27.71%, while AMP has yielded a comparatively lower 19.31% annualized return.


MS

1D
0.65%
1M
10.43%
YTD
21.88%
6M
21.28%
1Y
66.17%
3Y*
38.69%
5Y*
22.26%
10Y*
27.71%

AMP

1D
1.94%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
-5.75%
6M
-6.37%
1Y
-9.75%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
19.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MS vs. AMP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MS
Morgan Stanley
21.88%45.16%39.73%13.93%-10.34%46.65%38.09%32.67%-22.76%26.61%
AMP
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
-5.75%-6.73%42.10%23.99%4.98%57.92%19.82%63.96%-36.83%56.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MS and AMP is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2005

0.68

The correlation between MS and AMP shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.72 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MS:

$340.97B

AMP:

$43.39B

EPS

MS:

$11.41

AMP:

$30.77

PE Ratio

MS:

18.75

AMP:

14.92

PEG Ratio

MS:

1.76

AMP:

1.90

PS Ratio

MS:

2.84

AMP:

3.08

PB Ratio

MS:

3.26

AMP:

6.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

MS:

$120.22B

AMP:

$14.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MS:

$69.72B

AMP:

$7.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

MS:

$27.21B

AMP:

$5.13B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MS vs. AMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MS
MS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

AMP
AMP Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
AMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMP Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
AMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMP Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MS vs. AMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley (MS) and Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (AMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSAMPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

0.95

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

-0.47

+4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.65

-0.82

+12.47

MS vs. AMP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MS Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the AMP Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MS and AMP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MS vs. AMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MS drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than AMP's maximum drawdown of -81.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MS and AMP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSAMPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.12%

-81.14%

-6.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.83%

-20.87%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.24%

-26.39%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.38%

-31.54%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.33%

-53.88%

+2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-18.61%

+16.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-15.14%

-18.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.70%

11.92%

-6.22%

Volatility

MS vs. AMP - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley (MS) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (AMP) at 5.97%. This indicates that MS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSAMPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

5.97%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.46%

19.24%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.81%

24.92%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.75%

27.82%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.51%

33.97%

-2.46%

Dividends

MS vs. AMP - Dividend Comparison

MS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than AMP's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMP
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
1.42%1.28%1.09%1.40%1.57%1.47%2.10%2.29%3.38%1.91%2.63%2.43%
MS
Morgan Stanley
1.87%2.17%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%

Financials

MS vs. AMP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Morgan Stanley and Ameriprise Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
33.15B
0
(MS) Total Revenue
(AMP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MS and AMP have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MS has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to AMP (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MS dropped -88.12% vs AMP's -81.14%.

MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MS and AMP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer