MRVU vs. XDSQ
MRVU (Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MRVU is passively managed, while XDSQ is actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MRVU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
MRVU vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MRVU
- 1D
- 7.59%
- 1M
- 203.58%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 15.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.80%
- 10Y*
- —
MRVU vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MRVU Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF | 990.96% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRVU and XDSQ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRVU vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
MRVU
XDSQ
MRVU vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF (MRVU) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRVU | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1,424.91 | 0.69 | +1,424.22 |
Drawdowns
MRVU vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRVU drawdown since its inception was -21.03%, smaller than the maximum XDSQ drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVU and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRVU | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.03% | -26.06% | +5.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -4.96% | +0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility
MRVU vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRVU | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 175.93% | 10.56% | +165.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 175.93% | 15.27% | +160.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 175.93% | 15.10% | +160.83% |
MRVU vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRVU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRVU vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
MRVU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
MRVU Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF | 0.02% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRVU and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MRVU.
MRVU has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MRVU and 0.79% for XDSQ.
Find the right allocation for MRVU and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer