MRVU vs. QTAP
MRVU (Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MRVU is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MRVU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
MRVU vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MRVU
- 1D
- 10.26%
- 1M
- 215.52%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 6M
- 15.43%
- 1Y
- 25.33%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- —
MRVU vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MRVU Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF | 1,102.86% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 13.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRVU and QTAP is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRVU vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
MRVU
QTAP
MRVU vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF (MRVU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRVU | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1,774.55 | 0.75 | +1,773.80 |
Drawdowns
MRVU vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRVU drawdown since its inception was -21.03%, smaller than the maximum QTAP drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVU and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRVU | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.03% | -29.44% | +8.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.18% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -5.03% | +0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.32% | — |
Volatility
MRVU vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRVU | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 175.19% | 5.56% | +169.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 175.19% | 18.88% | +156.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 175.19% | 18.77% | +156.42% |
MRVU vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRVU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRVU vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
MRVU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
MRVU Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF | 0.02% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRVU and QTAP have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MRVU.
MRVU has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MRVU and 0.79% for QTAP.
Find the right allocation for MRVU and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer