MRVL vs. TER
MRVL (Marvell Technology, Inc.) and TER (Teradyne, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — MRVL in Semiconductors, TER in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 10 years, MRVL returned 41.26%/yr vs 34.87%/yr for TER. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MRVL vs. TER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRVL achieves a 240.32% return, which is significantly higher than TER's 93.73% return. Over the past 10 years, MRVL has outperformed TER with an annualized return of 41.26%, while TER has yielded a comparatively lower 34.87% annualized return.
MRVL
- 1D
- 9.63%
- 1M
- 69.78%
- YTD
- 240.32%
- 6M
- 214.35%
- 1Y
- 323.75%
- 3Y*
- 69.41%
- 5Y*
- 42.37%
- 10Y*
- 41.26%
TER
- 1D
- 4.68%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 93.73%
- 6M
- 84.73%
- 1Y
- 340.75%
- 3Y*
- 53.39%
- 5Y*
- 25.10%
- 10Y*
- 34.87%
MRVL vs. TER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 240.32% | -22.82% | 83.79% | 63.68% | -57.48% | 84.62% | 80.25% | 65.74% | -23.62% | 56.89% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 93.73% | 54.39% | 16.51% | 24.78% | -46.35% | 36.81% | 76.73% | 118.93% | -24.37% | 66.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRVL and TER is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2000 | 0.57 |
The correlation between MRVL and TER shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MRVL:
$258.03B
TER:
$59.06B
MRVL:
$2.90
TER:
$5.38
MRVL:
99.74
TER:
69.70
MRVL:
28.91
TER:
15.72
MRVL:
14.17
TER:
18.79
MRVL:
$8.72B
TER:
$3.79B
MRVL:
$4.41B
TER:
$2.23B
MRVL:
$4.27B
TER:
$1.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRVL vs. TER — Risk / Return Rank
MRVL
TER
MRVL vs. TER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRVL | TER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.63 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.37 | 12.85 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.64 | 46.52 | -17.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRVL | TER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.70 | 5.19 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.51 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.78 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.22 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
MRVL vs. TER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRVL drawdown since its inception was -91.60%, smaller than the maximum TER drawdown of -97.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVL and TER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRVL | TER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.60% | -97.30% | +5.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.36% | -26.73% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.79% | -58.18% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.88% | -59.12% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.88% | -59.12% | -2.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.72% | -10.34% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.77% | -58.69% | +11.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.37% | 7.37% | +4.00% |
Volatility
MRVL vs. TER - Volatility Comparison
Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a higher volatility of 38.50% compared to Teradyne, Inc. (TER) at 21.89%. This indicates that MRVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRVL | TER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.50% | 21.89% | +16.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.32% | 51.74% | +2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.56% | 66.25% | +3.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.51% | 49.92% | +11.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.77% | 45.15% | +6.62% |
Dividends
MRVL vs. TER - Dividend Comparison
MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than TER's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 0.08% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 0.65% | 0.21% | 0.50% | 0.90% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.73% | 2.72% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 0.13% | 0.25% | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 1.15% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.16% |
Financials
MRVL vs. TER - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marvell Technology, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MRVL vs. TER - Profitability Comparison
MRVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
TER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 780.95M and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.9%.
MRVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
TER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 473.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.
MRVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
TER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 398.91M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MRVL and TER have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRVL has higher volatility (38.50%) compared to TER (21.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRVL dropped -91.60% vs TER's -97.30%.
TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 4.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRVL and TER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer