MRVL vs. LRCX
MRVL (Marvell Technology, Inc.) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — MRVL in Semiconductors, LRCX in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 10 years, MRVL returned 33.34%/yr vs 43.64%/yr for LRCX. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
MRVL vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRVL achieves a 121.03% return, which is significantly higher than LRCX's 71.50% return. Over the past 10 years, MRVL has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 33.34%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 43.64% annualized return.
MRVL
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -31.04%
- 6M
- 137.84%
- YTD
- 121.03%
- 1Y
- 133.87%
- 3Y*
- 42.13%
- 5Y*
- 25.86%
- 10Y*
- 33.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.20%
LRCX
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -25.11%
- 6M
- 25.75%
- YTD
- 71.50%
- 1Y
- 210.67%
- 3Y*
- 61.40%
- 5Y*
- 37.09%
- 10Y*
- 43.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.65B | $3.82B | $3.92B | |
| $4.42B | $5.28B | $10.40B |
MRVL vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 121.03% | -22.82% | 83.79% | 63.68% | -57.48% | 84.62% | 80.25% | 65.74% | -23.62% | 56.89% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 71.50% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRVL and LRCX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000 | 0.57 |
The correlation between MRVL and LRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MRVL:
$164.26B
LRCX:
$366.44B
MRVL:
$2.90
LRCX:
$5.75
MRVL:
64.76
LRCX:
50.95
MRVL:
0.12
LRCX:
2.88
MRVL:
18.77
LRCX:
15.93
MRVL:
9.20
LRCX:
29.63
MRVL:
$8.72B
LRCX:
$23.23B
MRVL:
$4.41B
LRCX:
$11.73B
MRVL:
$4.27B
LRCX:
$8.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRVL vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
MRVL
LRCX
MRVL vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRVL | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.42 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 5.08 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | 21.44 | -12.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRVL vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRVL drawdown since its inception was -91.60%, roughly equal to the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVL and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRVL | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.60% | -87.90% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.35% | -41.76% | -6.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.79% | -47.10% | -13.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.88% | -56.39% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.88% | -56.39% | -5.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.71% | -32.38% | -8.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.63% | -28.13% | -18.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.14% | 9.87% | +5.27% |
Volatility
MRVL vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) have volatilities of 27.33% and 27.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRVL | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.33% | 27.34% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.31% | 52.39% | +12.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.92% | 63.10% | +14.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.78% | 48.97% | +14.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.85% | 46.20% | +6.65% |
Dividends
MRVL vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than LRCX's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.35% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 0.13% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 0.65% | 0.21% | 0.50% | 0.90% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.73% | 2.72% |
Financials
MRVL vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marvell Technology, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MRVL vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison
MRVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 6.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.
MRVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.51B and revenue of 6.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.4%.
MRVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 2.28B and revenue of 6.72B, resulting in a net margin of 33.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MRVL and LRCX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (27.34%) compared to MRVL (27.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRVL dropped -91.60% vs LRCX's -87.90%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRVL and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer