PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRSK vs. QQHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRSK vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRSK achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than QQHG's 11.43% return.


MRSK

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.38%
YTD
5.23%
6M
5.74%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*

QQHG

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.73%
YTD
11.43%
6M
10.75%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRSK vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MRSK
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF
5.23%14.50%
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
11.43%20.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MRSK and QQHG is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025

0.79

The correlation between MRSK and QQHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRSK vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRSK
MRSK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

QQHG
QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRSK vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRSKQQHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

2.82

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

3.92

-1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.51

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

4.30

-1.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.92

17.07

-7.15

MRSK vs. QQHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRSK Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the QQHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRSK and QQHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRSKQQHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.82

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

3.35

-2.39

Drawdowns

MRSK vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRSK drawdown since its inception was -14.70%, which is greater than QQHG's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSK and QQHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRSKQQHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.70%

-6.18%

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-6.18%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.26%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-0.97%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.55%

+0.39%

Volatility

MRSK vs. QQHG - Volatility Comparison

Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) at 2.12%. This indicates that MRSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRSKQQHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

2.12%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

6.66%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

9.47%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.67%

9.53%

+2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.84%

9.53%

+2.31%

MRSK vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRSK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRSK vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison

MRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than QQHG's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MRSK
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF
0.36%0.37%0.44%0.60%1.11%14.20%4.29%
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
0.20%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRSK and QQHG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRSK has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to QQHG (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRSK dropped -14.70% vs QQHG's -6.18%.

On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 26.43% vs 19.20% for MRSK. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, QQHG has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 26.43% return vs 19.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MRSK.

MRSK has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.

MRSK is categorized as Hedge Fund, while QQHG is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Toews Corp. and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MRSK and 0.45% for QQHG.

QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRSK and QQHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer