PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRSK vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRSK vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRSK achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 42.58% return.


MRSK

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.38%
YTD
5.23%
6M
5.74%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*

GSG

1D
0.77%
1M
-4.83%
YTD
42.58%
6M
41.06%
1Y
51.52%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRSK vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MRSK
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF
5.23%11.93%14.62%13.29%-11.86%20.74%16.42%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
42.58%5.93%8.52%-5.51%24.08%38.77%20.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MRSK and GSG is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.12

The correlation between MRSK and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRSK vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRSK
MRSK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRSK vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRSKGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

5.47

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.92

14.39

-4.47

MRSK vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRSK Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRSK and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRSKGSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.26

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.70

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

-0.09

+1.05

Drawdowns

MRSK vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRSK drawdown since its inception was -14.70%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSK and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRSKGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.70%

-89.62%

+74.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-9.46%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.22%

-14.94%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.70%

-29.12%

+14.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-56.95%

+56.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-63.71%

+60.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

3.59%

-1.65%

Volatility

MRSK vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) is 2.42%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that MRSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRSKGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

7.65%

-5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

20.42%

-12.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

22.95%

-12.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.67%

22.61%

-10.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.84%

22.03%

-10.19%

MRSK vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRSK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRSK vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

MRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MRSK
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF
0.36%0.37%0.44%0.60%1.11%14.20%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRSK and GSG have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to MRSK (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRSK dropped -14.70% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 5-year performance, GSG leads with 15.74% vs 8.16% for MRSK. On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MRSK has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSG has performed better with a 15.74% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MRSK.

MRSK has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

MRSK is categorized as Hedge Fund, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Toews Corp. and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MRSK and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRSK and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer