PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRSK vs. FMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRSK vs. FMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRSK achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than FMF's 10.96% return.


MRSK

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.38%
YTD
5.23%
6M
5.74%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*

FMF

1D
0.33%
1M
1.08%
YTD
10.96%
6M
11.47%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRSK vs. FMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MRSK
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF
5.23%11.93%14.62%13.29%-11.86%20.74%16.42%
FMF
First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund
10.96%4.54%8.17%-0.18%5.24%3.57%1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between MRSK and FMF is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.09

The correlation between MRSK and FMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (5 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRSK vs. FMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRSK
MRSK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FMF
FMF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRSK vs. FMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRSKFMFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

2.31

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

3.31

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.42

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

6.52

-4.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.92

18.49

-8.56

MRSK vs. FMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRSK Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRSK and FMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRSKFMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.31

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.43

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.17

+0.79

Drawdowns

MRSK vs. FMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRSK drawdown since its inception was -14.70%, smaller than the maximum FMF drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSK and FMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRSKFMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.70%

-22.21%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-3.42%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.22%

-7.25%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.70%

-14.98%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.07%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-9.86%

+6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.20%

+0.74%

Volatility

MRSK vs. FMF - Volatility Comparison

Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF) at 1.89%. This indicates that MRSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRSKFMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

1.89%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

7.11%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

9.66%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.67%

10.74%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.84%

11.72%

+0.12%

MRSK vs. FMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRSK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FMF's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRSK vs. FMF - Dividend Comparison

MRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than FMF's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMF
First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund
4.96%5.60%4.85%3.09%0.41%3.29%0.02%1.05%1.56%0.82%
MRSK
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF
0.36%0.37%0.44%0.60%1.11%14.20%4.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRSK and FMF have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRSK has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to FMF (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRSK dropped -14.70% vs FMF's -22.21%.

On 5-year performance, MRSK leads with 8.16% vs 4.62% for FMF. On fees, FMF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, FMF has been the lower-risk option at 1.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MRSK has performed better with a 8.16% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MRSK.

FMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 0.36% for MRSK.

They also come from different issuers: Toews Corp. and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MRSK and 0.95% for FMF.

FMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRSK and FMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer