MRSH vs. XLK
MRSH (Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 10 years, MRSH returned 12.43%/yr vs 24.16%/yr for XLK. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MRSH vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRSH achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 23.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MRSH has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 12.43%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 24.16% annualized return.
MRSH
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- 9.22%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 1Y
- -12.43%
- 3Y*
- 0.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
XLK
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- 6M
- 22.34%
- YTD
- 23.60%
- 1Y
- 37.95%
- 3Y*
- 26.66%
- 5Y*
- 19.65%
- 10Y*
- 24.16%
MRSH vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc | -0.81% | -11.26% | 13.75% | 16.15% | -3.45% | 50.83% | 6.86% | 42.33% | -0.14% | 22.73% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 23.60% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRSH and XLK is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.45 |
The correlation between MRSH and XLK shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRSH vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
MRSH
XLK
MRSH vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRSH | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.26 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 2.39 | -2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 7.13 | -8.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRSH vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRSH drawdown since its inception was -67.46%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSH and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRSH | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.46% | -82.05% | +14.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.47% | -15.92% | -8.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.36% | -25.66% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.36% | -33.56% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.80% | -33.56% | -2.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.00% | -10.33% | -13.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.43% | -34.84% | +17.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.05% | 5.34% | +8.71% |
Volatility
MRSH vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) is 9.39%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that MRSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRSH | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 9.89% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.69% | 20.95% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.97% | 24.54% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 25.58% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 24.80% | -3.76% |
Dividends
MRSH vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
MRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than XLK's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc | 1.98% | 1.85% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.45% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRSH and XLK have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to MRSH (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRSH dropped -67.46% vs XLK's -82.05%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRSH and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer