PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRGAX vs. MIGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRGAX vs. MIGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRGAX achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than MIGFX's -0.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MRGAX having a 14.22% annualized return and MIGFX not far ahead at 14.65%.


MRGAX

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.29%
YTD
8.17%
6M
8.03%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
14.22%

MIGFX

1D
-0.62%
1M
3.14%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
0.15%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
14.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRGAX vs. MIGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRGAX
MFS Core Equity Fund
8.17%12.33%20.01%22.88%-17.24%25.26%18.56%34.66%-4.12%23.79%
MIGFX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
-0.34%9.97%27.25%24.13%-19.20%26.06%22.55%39.89%0.81%28.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MRGAX and MIGFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1996

0.93

The correlation between MRGAX and MIGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRGAX vs. MIGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRGAX
MRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

MIGFX
MIGFX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MIGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MIGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRGAX vs. MIGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRGAXMIGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.15

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

0.76

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.19

2.55

+6.64

MRGAX vs. MIGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the MIGFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRGAX and MIGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRGAXMIGFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

0.83

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.58

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.81

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.39

+0.15

Drawdowns

MRGAX vs. MIGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRGAX drawdown since its inception was -54.04%, smaller than the maximum MIGFX drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRGAX and MIGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRGAXMIGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.04%

-61.83%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.53%

-13.77%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.22%

-18.68%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.08%

-26.67%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.41%

-32.42%

-0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-2.40%

+2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-18.96%

+10.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

4.11%

-1.86%

Volatility

MRGAX vs. MIGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) is 2.58%, while MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that MRGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRGAXMIGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

3.42%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

9.84%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

12.68%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

17.52%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.80%

18.21%

-0.41%

MRGAX vs. MIGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRGAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than MIGFX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRGAX vs. MIGFX - Dividend Comparison

MRGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.57%, more than MIGFX's 11.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIGFX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
11.43%11.39%17.15%4.11%4.49%10.47%7.43%7.39%10.76%6.87%5.12%6.51%
MRGAX
MFS Core Equity Fund
12.57%13.60%8.21%2.54%3.83%7.28%1.54%3.20%11.09%6.27%3.65%11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MRGAX and MIGFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MIGFX has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to MRGAX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRGAX dropped -54.04% vs MIGFX's -61.83%.

MRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRGAX and MIGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer