PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRGAX vs. VGHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRGAX vs. VGHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) and Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares (VGHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRGAX achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than VGHCX's -4.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MRGAX has outperformed VGHCX with an annualized return of 14.22%, while VGHCX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.79% annualized return.


MRGAX

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.29%
YTD
8.17%
6M
8.03%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
14.22%

VGHCX

1D
-1.56%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
-4.67%
6M
-4.29%
1Y
16.18%
3Y*
8.30%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRGAX vs. VGHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRGAX
MFS Core Equity Fund
8.17%12.33%20.01%22.88%-17.24%25.26%18.56%34.66%-4.12%23.79%
VGHCX
Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares
-4.67%19.63%8.99%5.46%-1.05%14.36%12.57%22.93%1.03%19.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MRGAX and VGHCX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1996

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between MRGAX and VGHCX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRGAX vs. VGHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRGAX
MRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VGHCX
VGHCX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VGHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VGHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRGAX vs. VGHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) and Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares (VGHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRGAXVGHCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.19

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.73

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.19

4.60

+4.59

MRGAX vs. VGHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the VGHCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRGAX and VGHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRGAXVGHCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.08

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.40

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.50

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.92

-0.38

Drawdowns

MRGAX vs. VGHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRGAX drawdown since its inception was -54.04%, which is greater than VGHCX's maximum drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRGAX and VGHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRGAXVGHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.04%

-36.93%

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.53%

-9.20%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.22%

-16.08%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.08%

-16.95%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.41%

-27.18%

-6.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-7.61%

+7.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-5.25%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

3.44%

-1.19%

Volatility

MRGAX vs. VGHCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) is 2.58%, while Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares (VGHCX) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that MRGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRGAXVGHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

3.79%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

10.35%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

14.75%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

18.21%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.80%

17.64%

+0.16%

MRGAX vs. VGHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRGAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than VGHCX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRGAX vs. VGHCX - Dividend Comparison

MRGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.57%, more than VGHCX's 6.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRGAX
MFS Core Equity Fund
12.57%13.60%8.21%2.54%3.83%7.28%1.54%3.20%11.09%6.27%3.65%11.02%
VGHCX
Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares
6.93%6.00%22.72%7.17%5.44%8.31%7.96%11.82%9.10%7.30%8.54%8.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRGAX and VGHCX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGHCX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to MRGAX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRGAX dropped -54.04% vs VGHCX's -36.93%.

MRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRGAX and VGHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer